From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756926Ab1GMQz0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:55:26 -0400 Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:51373 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756474Ab1GMQzY (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:55:24 -0400 From: Chris Ball To: Manoj Iyer Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, matsumur@nts.ricoh.co.jp, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: Added quirks for Ricoh 1180:e823 lower base clock frequency References: <1310419715-13254-1-git-send-email-manoj.iyer@canonical.com> <201107131835.25217.arnd@arndb.de> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:55:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Manoj Iyer's message of "Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:46:27 -0500 (CDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, Jul 13 2011, Manoj Iyer wrote: > Do you think that lowering the controller speed to 50Mhz in case we > have a failure is a better idea than reducing the speed for all e823 > ricoh controllers? I can send a V2 of the patch. What do you think ? It could be better. Do you think you could get hold of a UHS-1 card for testing with? (I don't think it's worth doing if there's no appreciable performance difference either way.) Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child