From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752983AbZI1TVN (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:21:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752397AbZI1TVN (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:21:13 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:36424 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751959AbZI1TVM (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:21:12 -0400 From: Andreas Schwab To: Greg KH Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: fix vt_compat_ioctl References: <20090928183337.GA10855@suse.de> X-Yow: YOW!!! I am having fun!!! Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:21:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20090928183337.GA10855@suse.de> (Greg KH's message of "Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:33:37 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg KH writes: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 08:10:02PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Call compat_unimap_ioctl, not do_unimap_ioctl. > > That's a nice description of what the patch does, but why do we need to > do that? It's a compat ioctl handler, so lets call the compat ioctl handler. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."