From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhcloos.com; s=ore14; t=1403641156; bh=6y9uABd7E/I/7nqMLMJ+aZkf/LII+HbuEor+sQy/yGU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=XvNDKqm5f8Mrd/BdyslydlN3jrbeHawlGEZH9wEKETagfTlxf1eUr9nknPZemE/mj PUBLvxPc4XYvqjtmMBWqP+j55MfRdqE5ud4D8rZzGEwv1D4XnDp/JaEmMZLS+kpgQ5 fz00Jf3MyiKoGBbGGUcNyADa18WVziBZ0agbhwfA= From: James Cloos In-Reply-To: <53A9D7F0.1010909@gmail.com> (Till Kamppeter's message of "Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:56:32 +0200") References: <53A9C50D.4000306@gmail.com> <53A9D7F0.1010909@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:59:19 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] ippusbd license List-Id: Printing architecture under linux List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Till Kamppeter Cc: "printing-architecture@lists.linux-foundation.org" >>>>> "TK" == Till Kamppeter writes: TK> What are the advantages of GPL2 against GPL3? That really should be 2+ vs 3+, just to be clear. (gpl2-only cannot link against gpl3, gpl3+, lgpl3+, agpl3 or agpl3+ code unless the latter has a linking-permitted clause.) 2+ vs 3+ is mostly about some entities wanting to avoid 3 at all costs. -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6