From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39672 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiTaF-0002gl-NB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:16:34 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <armbru@redhat.com>) id 1PiTXN-0007ox-4H
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:13:30 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:7727)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <armbru@redhat.com>) id 1PiTXM-0007om-SO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:13:29 -0500
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0RFDSTt022730
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:13:28 -0500
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?
References: <4D412CF0.30706@redhat.com> <m3vd1acyot.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:13:26 +0100
In-Reply-To: <m3vd1acyot.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> (Markus Armbruster's
	message of "Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:34:42 +0100")
Message-ID: <m339oe2xd5.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>

Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> writes:

> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> Before creating rc1 we need to make sure that all patches for 0.14 have 
>> been reviewed and applied.
>>
>> Please reply to this message with a subject starting with "[PING 0.14]" 
>> and a link to patchwork, gmane, or whatnot; or "[PULL 0.14]" for tree 
>> pulls.  Also, I believe all patches meant for stable should also start 
>> having "[PATCH 0.14]", too.
>
> All my outstanding patches are routed through Kevin's tree, which means
> I can leave this to him.

I'm working on a fix for the -drive if=scsi,index=N regression, to be
routed through Kevin's tree as well.  Should really go into 0.14.