From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34287) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Smkru-0007pY-Pr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 08:09:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Smkrm-0007iP-Ru for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 08:09:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:64516) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Smkrm-0007hp-Jl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 08:09:02 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1340984094-5451-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <1340984094-5451-23-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <4FF57B9E.1080505@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:08:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4FF57B9E.1080505@redhat.com> (Kevin Wolf's message of "Thu, 05 Jul 2012 13:33:50 +0200") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 22/32] qtest: Cover qdev properties for disk geometry List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com Kevin Wolf writes: > Am 29.06.2012 17:34, schrieb Markus Armbruster: >> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster >> --- >> tests/hd-geo-test.c | 6 ++++-- >> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tests/hd-geo-test.c b/tests/hd-geo-test.c >> index 0ab573c..02eb5c2 100644 >> --- a/tests/hd-geo-test.c >> +++ b/tests/hd-geo-test.c >> @@ -321,13 +321,15 @@ static void test_ide_drive_user(const char *dev, bool trans) >> const chst expected_chst = { secs / (4 * 32) , 4, 32, trans }; >> >> argc = setup_common(argv, ARRAY_SIZE(argv)); >> - opts = g_strdup_printf(",cyls=%d,heads=%d,secs=%d%s", >> + opts = g_strdup_printf("%s,cyls=%d,heads=%d,secs=%d%s", >> + dev && !trans ? dev : "", >> expected_chst.cyls, expected_chst.heads, >> expected_chst.secs, >> trans ? ",trans=lba" : ""); >> cur_ide[0] = &expected_chst; >> argc = setup_ide(argc, argv, ARRAY_SIZE(argv), >> - 0, dev, backend_small, mbr_chs, opts); >> + 0, dev && !trans ? opts : NULL, backend_small, mbr_chs, >> + dev && !trans ? "" : opts); >> qtest_start(g_strjoinv(" ", argv)); >> test_cmos(); >> qtest_quit(global_qtest); > > I've spent more time parsing this test code than I needed for the review > for most patches that touch actual code... Maybe an explicit if (dev && > !trans) would help somewhat. don't know. Sorry about that. It gets better again in PATCH 26/32.