From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41093) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RvQbv-0007Fk-OU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:48:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RvQbu-0004Tn-06 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:48:15 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56865) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RvQbt-0004TY-Pn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:48:13 -0500 From: Markus Armbruster References: <4F324A60.7070600@samsung.com> <4F326D66.6060808@suse.de> <4F329385.4030203@codemonkey.ws> Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:48:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4F329385.4030203@codemonkey.ws> (Anthony Liguori's message of "Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:23:49 -0600") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Restore consistent formatting List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Evgeny Voevodin , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Blue Swirl , Dmitry Solodkiy , Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= Anthony Liguori writes: > On 02/08/2012 09:04 AM, malc wrote: >> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Andreas F?rber wrote: >> >>> malc, >>> >>> Arbitrarily reformatting your files is not okay. If you want a different >>> formatting, you need to fix checkpatch.pl first to not error on that >>> formatting in your files. >> >> It was always formatter like this (internally consistent), then others >> added code which made it not so. > > We do have a mixed style in the audio layer. I'm not happy about that > but I also feel strongly that going through and doing a reformat is > not a worthwhile exercise. > > I can also understand the desire to keep things consistent. But > patches should always go to the mailing list. I certainly would have > acked such a patch FWIW. You buried the one truly important sentence, let me dig it out for you: *** Patches should always go to the mailing list *** Exceptions need justification. Responsible handling embargoed security issues may qualify. Style fixes certainly not. [...]