From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58236 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OMf5I-0004Ms-P5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 06:34:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <quintela@redhat.com>) id 1OMf50-00037Q-9T
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 06:33:47 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44508)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <quintela@redhat.com>) id 1OMf50-00036g-2l
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 06:33:46 -0400
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5AAXhdx027007
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 06:33:43 -0400
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100609175446.7296bee3@redhat.com> (Luiz Capitulino's message
	of "Wed, 9 Jun 2010 17:54:46 -0300")
References: <cover.1276085283.git.quintela@redhat.com>
	<71b2d15bfd8bdcff2561e5597de79ccb136177c0.1276085283.git.quintela@redhat.com>
	<20100609175446.7296bee3@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:33:42 +0200
Message-ID: <m3r5kfp46x.fsf@trasno.mitica>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] QMP: Introduce MIGRATION events
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed,  9 Jun 2010 14:10:56 +0200
> Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> wrote:

>> +MIGRATION_FAILED
>> +----------------
>> +
>> +Emitted when migration fails (both is source and target).  Notice
>> +that this event will be changed for 0.14 when we have infrastructure
>> +to emit a QError when things fail.
>
>  This is not the kind of information this file should have, compatible
> changes should be noted when time comes and incompatible ones are just
> forbidden after 0.13.

Then how you express that this value is going to have a QError in it on
the future?

Adding a Default QError that puts 'This QError is going to be refined'
or what?

Later, Juan.