From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=32776 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiR3w-0001h1-W1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:34:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiR3v-0000Ru-QP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:34:56 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38923) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiR3v-0000Rq-Jj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:34:55 -0500 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0RCYsTE013190 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:34:54 -0500 From: Markus Armbruster Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull? References: <4D412CF0.30706@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:34:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4D412CF0.30706@redhat.com> (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:29:36 +0100") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Kevin Wolf , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-devel , Gerd Hoffmann Paolo Bonzini writes: > Before creating rc1 we need to make sure that all patches for 0.14 have > been reviewed and applied. > > Please reply to this message with a subject starting with "[PING 0.14]" > and a link to patchwork, gmane, or whatnot; or "[PULL 0.14]" for tree > pulls. Also, I believe all patches meant for stable should also start > having "[PATCH 0.14]", too. All my outstanding patches are routed through Kevin's tree, which means I can leave this to him.