From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39326 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PpoAD-0006IY-S7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:39:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PpoAC-000296-IB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:39:53 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49389) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PpoAC-00028z-BW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:39:52 -0500 From: Markus Armbruster Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PING 0.14] Missing patches (mostly fixes) References: <4D412CF0.30706@redhat.com> <4D49B04F.80201@mail.berlios.de> <4D4BF160.9040500@codemonkey.ws> <4D5C32E5.8030702@mail.berlios.de> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:39:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4D5C32E5.8030702@mail.berlios.de> (Stefan Weil's message of "Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:26:13 +0100") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Weil Cc: qemu-devel , Luiz Capitulino Stefan Weil writes: > Am 04.02.2011 16:27, schrieb Markus Armbruster: >> Anthony Liguori writes: >> >> >>> On 02/02/2011 01:28 PM, Stefan Weil wrote: >>> >> [...] >> >>>> [PATCH 1/3] tests: Fix two memory leaks >>>> (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/79945/) >>>> >> >>>> [PATCH 2/3] check-qdict: Fix possible crash >>>> (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/79946/) >>>> >>> Luiz >>> >> I wouldn't bother with the second one for 0.14. Yes, we're reading >> lines from a file with %s, but it's a fixed file with known contents, no >> long lines, and we're reading it in a test program only developers ever >> use. >> >> As to the first one, Luiz has never touched that file. Neither have I, >> and it's not obvious to me why it should go into 0.14. >> >> [...] >> > > > Ack for qemu master then? I wouldn't bother myself, but I won't object, either.