From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent Bernat Subject: Re: nonlocal_bind and IPv6 Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:24:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1323879648-419-1-git-send-email-bernat@luffy.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org To: Maciej =?utf-8?Q?=C5=BBenczykowski?= Return-path: Received: from bart.luffy.cx ([78.47.78.131]:33322 "EHLO bart.luffy.cx" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751868Ab1LPGbN convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:31:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: ("Maciej =?utf-8?Q?=C5=BBenczykowski=22's?= message of "Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:58:01 -0800") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: OoO En ce milieu de nuit =C3=A9toil=C3=A9e du vendredi 16 d=C3=A9ce= mbre 2011, vers 04:58, Maciej =C5=BBenczykowski disait=C2=A0: > why not simply use the IP_TRANSPARENT or IP_FREEBIND socket options? Because this requires modifying each affected software. This can b= e difficult if you don't have the source code available. --=20 Vincent Bernat =E2=98=AF http://vincent.bernat.im panic("Detected a card I can't drive - whoops\n"); 2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/drivers/net/daynaport.c