From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lawrence MacIntyre Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 14:11:30 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2? MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-jX/ixBOU2tlP47rnNhoX" Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: To: lartc@vger.kernel.org --=-jX/ixBOU2tlP47rnNhoX Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've used HTB and CBQ to protect MPEG2 traffic streams from UDP traffic over 100 Mb/s interfaces. I have not yet attempted this with 1000 Mb/s interfaces, but I hope to get to that this year (it it much more difficult to measure accurately at this speed). On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 09:49, Anton Yurchenko wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems.=20 > Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC=20 > related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached=20 > to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more=20 > ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and=20 > rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the=20 > same issue? thanks --=20 Lawrence MacIntyre 865.574.8696 lpz@ornl.gov Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Performance Information Infrastructure Technology Group --=-jX/ixBOU2tlP47rnNhoX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/hBsSCNjP8rawCW4RAjBCAJ0YY475kAd2CG3Uhdhh1WxfEohxlACfbwTt rMSRTHCMsY485UaW55zlgkw= =8YzZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-jX/ixBOU2tlP47rnNhoX-- _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/