* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
@ 2019-01-23 19:56 ` Palmer Dabbelt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Palmer Dabbelt @ 2019-01-23 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: logang
Cc: Christoph Hellwig, robh, dalias, ysato, linux-kernel, sbates,
linux-riscv, Christoph Hellwig, dan.j.williams
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:30:44 PST (-0800), logang@deltatee.com wrote:
>
>
> On 2019-01-15 6:58 a.m., Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>>
>> Probably no need to keep this in a series with the RISC-V code, this can
>> be queued up by the sh folks independently.
>
> Oh, yeah, sorry, I obviously didn't pay enough attention to this when I
> resent it. I sent the similar Arm changes to the appropriate list and,
> yes, the sh ones should go to that maintainer.
>
> @Palmer: if you can just look at taking the second patch, I'll resubmit
> the first one to the appropriate list.
Works for me. I'll queue the second patch into my staging branch, targeted for
the next merge window.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
@ 2019-01-23 19:56 ` Palmer Dabbelt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Palmer Dabbelt @ 2019-01-23 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: logang
Cc: robh, dalias, ysato, dan.j.williams, linux-kernel, sbates,
Christoph Hellwig, linux-riscv, Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:30:44 PST (-0800), logang@deltatee.com wrote:
>
>
> On 2019-01-15 6:58 a.m., Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>>
>> Probably no need to keep this in a series with the RISC-V code, this can
>> be queued up by the sh folks independently.
>
> Oh, yeah, sorry, I obviously didn't pay enough attention to this when I
> resent it. I sent the similar Arm changes to the appropriate list and,
> yes, the sh ones should go to that maintainer.
>
> @Palmer: if you can just look at taking the second patch, I'll resubmit
> the first one to the appropriate list.
Works for me. I'll queue the second patch into my staging branch, targeted for
the next merge window.
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
2019-01-23 19:56 ` Palmer Dabbelt
@ 2019-01-23 20:31 ` Logan Gunthorpe
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Logan Gunthorpe @ 2019-01-23 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Palmer Dabbelt
Cc: Christoph Hellwig, robh, dalias, ysato, linux-kernel, sbates,
linux-riscv, Christoph Hellwig, dan.j.williams
On 2019-01-23 12:56 p.m., Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:30:44 PST (-0800), logang@deltatee.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2019-01-15 6:58 a.m., Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>>>
>>> Probably no need to keep this in a series with the RISC-V code, this can
>>> be queued up by the sh folks independently.
>>
>> Oh, yeah, sorry, I obviously didn't pay enough attention to this when I
>> resent it. I sent the similar Arm changes to the appropriate list and,
>> yes, the sh ones should go to that maintainer.
>>
>> @Palmer: if you can just look at taking the second patch, I'll resubmit
>> the first one to the appropriate list.
>
> Works for me. I'll queue the second patch into my staging branch, targeted for
> the next merge window.
Thanks!
Logan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
@ 2019-01-23 20:31 ` Logan Gunthorpe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Logan Gunthorpe @ 2019-01-23 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Palmer Dabbelt
Cc: robh, dalias, ysato, dan.j.williams, linux-kernel, sbates,
Christoph Hellwig, linux-riscv, Christoph Hellwig
On 2019-01-23 12:56 p.m., Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:30:44 PST (-0800), logang@deltatee.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2019-01-15 6:58 a.m., Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>>>
>>> Probably no need to keep this in a series with the RISC-V code, this can
>>> be queued up by the sh folks independently.
>>
>> Oh, yeah, sorry, I obviously didn't pay enough attention to this when I
>> resent it. I sent the similar Arm changes to the appropriate list and,
>> yes, the sh ones should go to that maintainer.
>>
>> @Palmer: if you can just look at taking the second patch, I'll resubmit
>> the first one to the appropriate list.
>
> Works for me. I'll queue the second patch into my staging branch, targeted for
> the next merge window.
Thanks!
Logan
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
2019-01-23 19:56 ` Palmer Dabbelt
@ 2019-03-19 17:56 ` Logan Gunthorpe
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Logan Gunthorpe @ 2019-03-19 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Palmer Dabbelt
Cc: robh, dalias, ysato, dan.j.williams, linux-kernel, sbates,
Christoph Hellwig, linux-riscv, Christoph Hellwig
Hey Palmer,
On 2019-01-23 12:56 p.m., Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> @Palmer: if you can just look at taking the second patch, I'll resubmit
>> the first one to the appropriate list.
>
> Works for me. I'll queue the second patch into my staging branch, targeted for
> the next merge window.
It doesn't look like my sparesmem patch made it into v5.1-rc1. Did it
fall through the cracks?
Thanks,
Logan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
@ 2019-03-19 17:56 ` Logan Gunthorpe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Logan Gunthorpe @ 2019-03-19 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Palmer Dabbelt
Cc: robh, dalias, ysato, linux-kernel, sbates, Christoph Hellwig,
dan.j.williams, Christoph Hellwig, linux-riscv
Hey Palmer,
On 2019-01-23 12:56 p.m., Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> @Palmer: if you can just look at taking the second patch, I'll resubmit
>> the first one to the appropriate list.
>
> Works for me. I'll queue the second patch into my staging branch, targeted for
> the next merge window.
It doesn't look like my sparesmem patch made it into v5.1-rc1. Did it
fall through the cracks?
Thanks,
Logan
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
2019-03-19 17:56 ` Logan Gunthorpe
@ 2019-03-20 2:54 ` Palmer Dabbelt
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Palmer Dabbelt @ 2019-03-20 2:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: logang
Cc: robh, dalias, ysato, dan.j.williams, linux-kernel, sbates,
Christoph Hellwig, linux-riscv, Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:56:52 PDT (-0700), logang@deltatee.com wrote:
> Hey Palmer,
>
> On 2019-01-23 12:56 p.m., Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>> @Palmer: if you can just look at taking the second patch, I'll resubmit
>>> the first one to the appropriate list.
>>
>> Works for me. I'll queue the second patch into my staging branch, targeted for
>> the next merge window.
>
> It doesn't look like my sparesmem patch made it into v5.1-rc1. Did it
> fall through the cracks?
It must have, sorry. Is this what you're referring to?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10754911/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
@ 2019-03-20 2:54 ` Palmer Dabbelt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Palmer Dabbelt @ 2019-03-20 2:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: logang
Cc: robh, dalias, ysato, linux-kernel, sbates, Christoph Hellwig,
dan.j.williams, Christoph Hellwig, linux-riscv
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:56:52 PDT (-0700), logang@deltatee.com wrote:
> Hey Palmer,
>
> On 2019-01-23 12:56 p.m., Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>> @Palmer: if you can just look at taking the second patch, I'll resubmit
>>> the first one to the appropriate list.
>>
>> Works for me. I'll queue the second patch into my staging branch, targeted for
>> the next merge window.
>
> It doesn't look like my sparesmem patch made it into v5.1-rc1. Did it
> fall through the cracks?
It must have, sorry. Is this what you're referring to?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10754911/
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
2019-03-20 2:54 ` Palmer Dabbelt
@ 2019-03-20 17:43 ` Logan Gunthorpe
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Logan Gunthorpe @ 2019-03-20 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Palmer Dabbelt
Cc: robh, dalias, ysato, linux-kernel, sbates, Christoph Hellwig,
dan.j.williams, Christoph Hellwig, linux-riscv
On 2019-03-19 8:54 p.m., Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:56:52 PDT (-0700), logang@deltatee.com wrote:
>> Hey Palmer,
>>
>> On 2019-01-23 12:56 p.m., Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>>> @Palmer: if you can just look at taking the second patch, I'll resubmit
>>>> the first one to the appropriate list.
>>>
>>> Works for me. I'll queue the second patch into my staging branch, targeted for
>>> the next merge window.
>>
>> It doesn't look like my sparesmem patch made it into v5.1-rc1. Did it
>> fall through the cracks?
>
> It must have, sorry. Is this what you're referring to?
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10754911/
Yes, though it conflicts with v5.1-rc1 due to some code reorganization.
I've updated it and we will submit it later this week as part of a
larger patch set which helps enable p2p on RISC-V.
Logan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
@ 2019-03-20 17:43 ` Logan Gunthorpe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Logan Gunthorpe @ 2019-03-20 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Palmer Dabbelt
Cc: robh, dalias, ysato, linux-kernel, linux-riscv, sbates,
Christoph Hellwig, dan.j.williams, Christoph Hellwig
On 2019-03-19 8:54 p.m., Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:56:52 PDT (-0700), logang@deltatee.com wrote:
>> Hey Palmer,
>>
>> On 2019-01-23 12:56 p.m., Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>>> @Palmer: if you can just look at taking the second patch, I'll resubmit
>>>> the first one to the appropriate list.
>>>
>>> Works for me. I'll queue the second patch into my staging branch, targeted for
>>> the next merge window.
>>
>> It doesn't look like my sparesmem patch made it into v5.1-rc1. Did it
>> fall through the cracks?
>
> It must have, sorry. Is this what you're referring to?
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10754911/
Yes, though it conflicts with v5.1-rc1 due to some code reorganization.
I've updated it and we will submit it later this week as part of a
larger patch set which helps enable p2p on RISC-V.
Logan
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
2019-03-20 17:43 ` Logan Gunthorpe
@ 2019-03-21 8:37 ` Palmer Dabbelt
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Palmer Dabbelt @ 2019-03-21 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: logang
Cc: robh, dalias, ysato, linux-kernel, linux-riscv, sbates,
Christoph Hellwig, dan.j.williams, Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:43:09 PDT (-0700), logang@deltatee.com wrote:
>
>
> On 2019-03-19 8:54 p.m., Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:56:52 PDT (-0700), logang@deltatee.com wrote:
>>> Hey Palmer,
>>>
>>> On 2019-01-23 12:56 p.m., Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>>>> @Palmer: if you can just look at taking the second patch, I'll resubmit
>>>>> the first one to the appropriate list.
>>>>
>>>> Works for me. I'll queue the second patch into my staging branch, targeted for
>>>> the next merge window.
>>>
>>> It doesn't look like my sparesmem patch made it into v5.1-rc1. Did it
>>> fall through the cracks?
>>
>> It must have, sorry. Is this what you're referring to?
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10754911/
>
> Yes, though it conflicts with v5.1-rc1 due to some code reorganization.
>
> I've updated it and we will submit it later this week as part of a
> larger patch set which helps enable p2p on RISC-V.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
@ 2019-03-21 8:37 ` Palmer Dabbelt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Palmer Dabbelt @ 2019-03-21 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: logang
Cc: robh, dalias, ysato, linux-kernel, sbates, Christoph Hellwig,
linux-riscv, Christoph Hellwig, dan.j.williams
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:43:09 PDT (-0700), logang@deltatee.com wrote:
>
>
> On 2019-03-19 8:54 p.m., Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:56:52 PDT (-0700), logang@deltatee.com wrote:
>>> Hey Palmer,
>>>
>>> On 2019-01-23 12:56 p.m., Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>>>> @Palmer: if you can just look at taking the second patch, I'll resubmit
>>>>> the first one to the appropriate list.
>>>>
>>>> Works for me. I'll queue the second patch into my staging branch, targeted for
>>>> the next merge window.
>>>
>>> It doesn't look like my sparesmem patch made it into v5.1-rc1. Did it
>>> fall through the cracks?
>>
>> It must have, sorry. Is this what you're referring to?
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10754911/
>
> Yes, though it conflicts with v5.1-rc1 due to some code reorganization.
>
> I've updated it and we will submit it later this week as part of a
> larger patch set which helps enable p2p on RISC-V.
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 0/2] [PATCH v2 0/6] sparsemem support for RISC-V
@ 2019-01-09 20:39 Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-09 20:39 ` Logan Gunthorpe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Logan Gunthorpe @ 2019-01-09 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-riscv
Cc: Stephen Bates, Palmer Dabbelt, Christoph Hellwig, Logan Gunthorpe
This patchset implements sparsemem on RISC-V. The first couple patches
from the previous version have been merged into v4.20 and the ARM patches
have been sent separately to the ARM maintainers. These are the RISC-V
patches only.
This is the first small step in supporting P2P on RISC-V.
--
Changes in v4:
* Rebased onto v5.0-rc1
* Changed the SECTION_SIZE_BITS to 27, per Nick Kossifidis
Changes in v3 (only sent the common patches):
* Rebased on v4.20-rc1
* Minor fixups
* Collected Ack from Will Deacon
Changes in v2:
* Rebase on v4.19-rc8
* Move the STRUCT_PAGE_MAX_SHIFT define into a common header (near
the definition of struct page). As suggested by Christoph.
* Clean up the unnecessary nid variable in the memblocks_present()
function, per Christoph.
* Collected tags from Palmer and Catalin.
--
Logan Gunthorpe (2):
sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
RISC-V: Implement sparsemem
arch/riscv/Kconfig | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
arch/riscv/include/asm/sparsemem.h | 11 +++++++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 4 +++-
arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 8 ++++++++
arch/sh/mm/init.c | 7 +------
6 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/sparsemem.h
--
2.19.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
2019-01-09 20:39 [PATCH v4 0/2] [PATCH v2 0/6] sparsemem support for RISC-V Logan Gunthorpe
@ 2019-01-09 20:39 ` Logan Gunthorpe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Logan Gunthorpe @ 2019-01-09 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-riscv
Cc: Stephen Bates, Palmer Dabbelt, Christoph Hellwig,
Logan Gunthorpe, Yoshinori Sato, Rich Felker, Dan Williams,
Rob Herring
Cleanup the open coded for_each_memblock() loop that is equivalent
to the new memblocks_present() helper.
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
arch/sh/mm/init.c | 7 +------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/init.c b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
index a8e5c0e00fca..dc0ff41d602d 100644
--- a/arch/sh/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
@@ -234,12 +234,7 @@ static void __init do_init_bootmem(void)
plat_mem_setup();
- for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
- int nid = memblock_get_region_node(reg);
-
- memory_present(nid, memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg),
- memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(reg));
- }
+ memblocks_present();
sparse_init();
}
--
2.19.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
@ 2019-01-09 20:39 ` Logan Gunthorpe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Logan Gunthorpe @ 2019-01-09 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-riscv
Cc: Rob Herring, Rich Felker, Yoshinori Sato, Palmer Dabbelt,
Stephen Bates, Dan Williams, Logan Gunthorpe, Christoph Hellwig
Cleanup the open coded for_each_memblock() loop that is equivalent
to the new memblocks_present() helper.
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
arch/sh/mm/init.c | 7 +------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/init.c b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
index a8e5c0e00fca..dc0ff41d602d 100644
--- a/arch/sh/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
@@ -234,12 +234,7 @@ static void __init do_init_bootmem(void)
plat_mem_setup();
- for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
- int nid = memblock_get_region_node(reg);
-
- memory_present(nid, memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg),
- memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(reg));
- }
+ memblocks_present();
sparse_init();
}
--
2.19.0
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
2019-01-09 20:39 ` Logan Gunthorpe
@ 2019-01-15 13:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2019-01-15 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Logan Gunthorpe
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-riscv, Rob Herring, Rich Felker,
Yoshinori Sato, Palmer Dabbelt, Stephen Bates, Dan Williams,
Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:39:10PM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> Cleanup the open coded for_each_memblock() loop that is equivalent
> to the new memblocks_present() helper.
Looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Probably no need to keep this in a series with the RISC-V code, this can
be queued up by the sh folks independently.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
@ 2019-01-15 13:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2019-01-15 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Logan Gunthorpe
Cc: Rob Herring, Rich Felker, Yoshinori Sato, Palmer Dabbelt,
linux-kernel, Stephen Bates, linux-riscv, Christoph Hellwig,
Dan Williams
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:39:10PM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> Cleanup the open coded for_each_memblock() loop that is equivalent
> to the new memblocks_present() helper.
Looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Probably no need to keep this in a series with the RISC-V code, this can
be queued up by the sh folks independently.
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
2019-01-15 13:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2019-01-15 17:30 ` Logan Gunthorpe
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Logan Gunthorpe @ 2019-01-15 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig
Cc: Rob Herring, Rich Felker, Yoshinori Sato, Palmer Dabbelt,
linux-kernel, Stephen Bates, linux-riscv, Christoph Hellwig,
Dan Williams
On 2019-01-15 6:58 a.m., Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> Probably no need to keep this in a series with the RISC-V code, this can
> be queued up by the sh folks independently.
Oh, yeah, sorry, I obviously didn't pay enough attention to this when I
resent it. I sent the similar Arm changes to the appropriate list and,
yes, the sh ones should go to that maintainer.
@Palmer: if you can just look at taking the second patch, I'll resubmit
the first one to the appropriate list.
Thanks,
Logan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
@ 2019-01-15 17:30 ` Logan Gunthorpe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Logan Gunthorpe @ 2019-01-15 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig
Cc: Rob Herring, Rich Felker, Yoshinori Sato, Palmer Dabbelt,
Dan Williams, linux-kernel, Stephen Bates, linux-riscv,
Christoph Hellwig
On 2019-01-15 6:58 a.m., Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> Probably no need to keep this in a series with the RISC-V code, this can
> be queued up by the sh folks independently.
Oh, yeah, sorry, I obviously didn't pay enough attention to this when I
resent it. I sent the similar Arm changes to the appropriate list and,
yes, the sh ones should go to that maintainer.
@Palmer: if you can just look at taking the second patch, I'll resubmit
the first one to the appropriate list.
Thanks,
Logan
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-03-21 8:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-01-23 19:56 [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper Palmer Dabbelt
2019-01-23 19:56 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2019-01-23 20:31 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-23 20:31 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-03-19 17:56 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-03-19 17:56 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-03-20 2:54 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2019-03-20 2:54 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2019-03-20 17:43 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-03-20 17:43 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-03-21 8:37 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2019-03-21 8:37 ` Palmer Dabbelt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-01-09 20:39 [PATCH v4 0/2] [PATCH v2 0/6] sparsemem support for RISC-V Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-09 20:39 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-09 20:39 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-15 13:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-15 13:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-15 17:30 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-15 17:30 ` Logan Gunthorpe
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.