From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838B8C4727E for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4280B20717 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dabbelt-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@dabbelt-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="AqQExuuf" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726803AbgI1Qpd (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:45:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32896 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726625AbgI1Qpd (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:45:33 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x543.google.com (mail-pg1-x543.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::543]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C1AFC061755 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:45:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x543.google.com with SMTP id d13so1352715pgl.6 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:45:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dabbelt-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:subject:in-reply-to:cc:from:to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=k5CJhKG0GbJaPZMSQdNzm2ZEeN1+360gQym/jYiLma0=; b=AqQExuufL4ixmO5/UkGibL3PcztVwBX8O7C4i1UIWVFxMUZPsLVdhF5Fjo9eBPQnYt j3j3aEfYHBfGQX67Mj2YACZXHEHUVkn9DfAmHWFo0t9w3dn2/D0JbaMFFzM9BZzjcbYX PfjtwgMcignt7LJnGbHBMXEbX8Z0AytN8hN5XVj/VfwdFqiwVzkXDW7Mr2GqOP8pYbMF TVko7kR9uCWOv/oEZvem9CrM7u3HYAIWIrDh+zLyG3TcRLw5A9ykRx/c8K5ZJu20ylDf 4180YnTsy1CE/aP/Lu17Hxm4FpOgdq+t4WoGagvXZs36ZwgceawDRcFUBsH1U68uIdD2 xCdg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:subject:in-reply-to:cc:from:to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k5CJhKG0GbJaPZMSQdNzm2ZEeN1+360gQym/jYiLma0=; b=nSr3HrhemzKo+pwmwaJNo6MIG3djYvmP43sNCZKCCb5Sthszg8pPQRCELIb12obyXH 9EsZ2ZtTOumlatTQleHfDn+WvjIhnD+RsG+HRsxcfNt8Hx5YSG3mP6cXxbF15lnfWT/k B4p4cVeq3LjPd8eyCDI1E0AotAX7N4NrFw/g3QtXWbITUGNT0hVgKh8OfVOnxrc2cHqQ wWM1Zyz84AiRyM5bxGHBQES6kb5LhoJIU6AQvidbtBuKSRbnsbDUAg6s59Nf0PKFUNf8 FANKmsqOvEdoZV/WzlW0GLkREdxud0pWRT/VjsXThm0Ssb4DwMK1d+AKJv+lmb6F0pxD BMPA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5330y+tPHkY8H6V09bt18KR3KywlwC7RkeQGujCY3BuQzPPueWwo ObIRhx8P5IbfjX20M7zuaUc4PPe/pYJ9z03n X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwJo4C3QCkhpc5E6SNAbf9qW6KUQzb1KDeTrpgbWI5Op/tVKk2PV+95gaM7lOraa7QOH6n1aQ== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9f99:0:b029:13e:d13d:a134 with SMTP id z25-20020aa79f990000b029013ed13da134mr284820pfr.28.1601311530896; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:45:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (76-210-143-223.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [76.210.143.223]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q16sm2392966pfj.117.2020.09.28.09.45.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:45:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:45:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:45:28 PDT (-0700) Subject: Re: remove set_fs for riscv v2 In-Reply-To: <20200928124928.GA5834@lst.de> CC: Christoph Hellwig , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, Arnd Bergmann , Paul Walmsley , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org From: Palmer Dabbelt To: Christoph Hellwig Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 05:49:28 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 10:50:52AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >> On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 21:37:52 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> Given tht we've not made much progress with the common branch, >>> are you fine just picking this up through the riscv tree for 5.10? >>> >>> I'll defer other architectures that depend on the common changes to >>> 5.11 then. >> >> I'm OK taking it, but there's a few things I'd like to sort out. IIRC I put it >> on a temporary branch over here >> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/palmer/linux.git/log/?h=riscv-remove_set_fs >> >> under the assumption it might get lost otherwise, but let me know if that's not >> what you were looking for. > > Well, we'll want it in linux-next and then 5.10. Either a merge through > the RISC-V maintainer, or as part of the base branch from Al would > make sense to me. Sorry, I guess my question was really: does that branch have all the dependencies necessary for the RISC-V stuff to actually work? IIRC this actual patch set depended on some other one, and while I thinK I got everything I don't want to pull in something broken. >> Arnd: Are you OK with the asm-generic stuff? I couldn't find anything in my >> mail history, so sorry if I just missed it. >> >> Al: IIRC the plan here was to have me merge in a feature branch with this >> stuff, but it'd have to be based on your for-next as there are some >> dependencies over there. I see 5ae4998b5d6f ("powerpc: remove address space >> overrides using set_fs()") in vfs/for-next so I think we should be OK, but let >> me know if I'm doing something wrong. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE360C47431 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B15B2073A for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="p3ZFeHTA"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=dabbelt-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@dabbelt-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="AqQExuuf" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5B15B2073A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dabbelt.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Mime-Version:Message-ID:To:From:In-Reply-To:Subject: Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:References:List-Owner; bh=OliFCF6DptatGJKOZ9PqRQfvgE62QifIKp2EPledWqk=; b=p3ZFeHTA9qgIx9mro2Cd0EcAG K74MrQknsETuwj4mB9faeesJ7cHjEqB9yT5N6YzXE5YBGj9lDzWvEZ3is2cO7UIuhaPvBvpLpd6Rp 5eSyPQdvNvkSnMSFNZy0mX1b8DlcNdEGoh8E3EsaxEQh9htRzfMlnW5j1GV3IL5jyfecOumng+MSy GWTl4xzcK5EjLFRMoP2+XiL/oVm7FWa4lLfRU76YO9X1C/6nf+x6H+3JwC3j8vAYJnSh9mwZvVASX JN50SeVp48tiLTHEdYXgIOa4RguN64moH2FTpBsqVAdUX/Shoz+8pJYotkSJCdnActtzbOehbN0Y0 UAeF9PbEQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kMwJ9-0006AN-6E; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:47:23 +0000 Received: from mail-pg1-f196.google.com ([209.85.215.196]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kMwHQ-0005FK-U6 for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:46:02 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-f196.google.com with SMTP id 7so1333632pgm.11 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:45:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dabbelt-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:subject:in-reply-to:cc:from:to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=k5CJhKG0GbJaPZMSQdNzm2ZEeN1+360gQym/jYiLma0=; b=AqQExuufL4ixmO5/UkGibL3PcztVwBX8O7C4i1UIWVFxMUZPsLVdhF5Fjo9eBPQnYt j3j3aEfYHBfGQX67Mj2YACZXHEHUVkn9DfAmHWFo0t9w3dn2/D0JbaMFFzM9BZzjcbYX PfjtwgMcignt7LJnGbHBMXEbX8Z0AytN8hN5XVj/VfwdFqiwVzkXDW7Mr2GqOP8pYbMF TVko7kR9uCWOv/oEZvem9CrM7u3HYAIWIrDh+zLyG3TcRLw5A9ykRx/c8K5ZJu20ylDf 4180YnTsy1CE/aP/Lu17Hxm4FpOgdq+t4WoGagvXZs36ZwgceawDRcFUBsH1U68uIdD2 xCdg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:subject:in-reply-to:cc:from:to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k5CJhKG0GbJaPZMSQdNzm2ZEeN1+360gQym/jYiLma0=; b=qdCW4Wkr0YPsfpFgPOusfFUYeHrAEZRnXLv1jmQDRKQLXMuX0UhanFN6hL3oZ5uJw0 zrOC0rbZq68ogCVXiWHy3QNfKfOJgErurBh3TXdG8Y8/InQBhTFFzR3Fa6Ro93lsGDGm zSpJ9g2DI60qyrduCF1OpU51uyQnWC08SUTBzVRRbrTqtywYAYnUHDOhset/QA/aeHY5 NrYJh5bcSRAg8Xi5os+2rPNcE3Rxc0/jvsXi/kywEmG6kPsNOJqzQX0VoELO/zYPskmB nnRiZZXN3Ny5R687U5zBmTobNbQ0/KNYVlIlbc6U7eoVMXTrQqqV1JR/9WVJQYbmmIbA O6aQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533XuIxJblnghqqHctsRrx3ydfMHDANBvYJ2tAOeH9JXsw+iET4I neO8rYQo/EvDkYp/MraAycLMOg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwJo4C3QCkhpc5E6SNAbf9qW6KUQzb1KDeTrpgbWI5Op/tVKk2PV+95gaM7lOraa7QOH6n1aQ== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9f99:0:b029:13e:d13d:a134 with SMTP id z25-20020aa79f990000b029013ed13da134mr284820pfr.28.1601311530896; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:45:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (76-210-143-223.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [76.210.143.223]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q16sm2392966pfj.117.2020.09.28.09.45.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:45:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:45:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:45:28 PDT (-0700) Subject: Re: remove set_fs for riscv v2 In-Reply-To: <20200928124928.GA5834@lst.de> From: Palmer Dabbelt To: Christoph Hellwig Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200928_124537_005450_72B9556C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.15 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, Paul Walmsley , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 05:49:28 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 10:50:52AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >> On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 21:37:52 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> Given tht we've not made much progress with the common branch, >>> are you fine just picking this up through the riscv tree for 5.10? >>> >>> I'll defer other architectures that depend on the common changes to >>> 5.11 then. >> >> I'm OK taking it, but there's a few things I'd like to sort out. IIRC I put it >> on a temporary branch over here >> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/palmer/linux.git/log/?h=riscv-remove_set_fs >> >> under the assumption it might get lost otherwise, but let me know if that's not >> what you were looking for. > > Well, we'll want it in linux-next and then 5.10. Either a merge through > the RISC-V maintainer, or as part of the base branch from Al would > make sense to me. Sorry, I guess my question was really: does that branch have all the dependencies necessary for the RISC-V stuff to actually work? IIRC this actual patch set depended on some other one, and while I thinK I got everything I don't want to pull in something broken. >> Arnd: Are you OK with the asm-generic stuff? I couldn't find anything in my >> mail history, so sorry if I just missed it. >> >> Al: IIRC the plan here was to have me merge in a feature branch with this >> stuff, but it'd have to be based on your for-next as there are some >> dependencies over there. I see 5ae4998b5d6f ("powerpc: remove address space >> overrides using set_fs()") in vfs/for-next so I think we should be OK, but let >> me know if I'm doing something wrong. _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv