From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CA2C433E2 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 03:29:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56E8E206D7 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 03:29:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="IU3/ZoZ3"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="Ef1yT7HO" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 56E8E206D7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Mime-Version:Message-ID:To:From:In-Reply-To:Subject: Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:References:List-Owner; bh=vLhvn3ToQuilozZRjnV5wGQBSen7M0OhVkhM2vZsKZo=; b=IU3/ZoZ3x0eiH8uhuLp8XLw69 kdTOdNpflUg7hir70A0186e+Fh9+hwoigOPLPaAKnaqm+FOwmcEPLw4ecD7fzr/SMYIpgmfiTEsV4 nRWaQ4I2abCP/7YTcm5kqMIunsTVfgz8c1iKcpxc7EynqC4EHrJlOlIQyXwrSs/6oiU9IoM2gp8w0 DXkz4JoQt+p4nrvDsIsPSSmxJDrGFNABn8obEzaand62IB/Q+BuMwbbBeYLQmY9FBp6SNbMhWbCfR R/DUC9cl0JcU7t4IDH7qKGcSQNhhDOuaAKY9kwrrwCyF583r99h80AYa2ImrY/4XO6MjMBm4fIImt 5t/DUEIuA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jy5Ri-0005nt-NI; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 03:29:30 +0000 Received: from mail-pj1-x1043.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::1043]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jy5Rg-0005nY-Ew for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 03:29:29 +0000 Received: by mail-pj1-x1043.google.com with SMTP id k5so442205pjg.3 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 20:29:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:subject:in-reply-to:cc:from:to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BtuBGK4t/FRFS+JgAekun0SML2az4OmXyKU6ZI8gNZg=; b=Ef1yT7HOSIyfdHphlAeHPa8Dt7+28NzF/D74RHSureRr5KDZYFOeIngq2sq1Z5QhsA GiA0QnWzeCkAHVvPEN7FCT29Rfs0LWIMvkquJw+u/KpGVmXxOR3opj/fkh0CSa+7M1bg 6YhvWj1TrPadHvIjdcFuyCHaKQO0mTnUEu6Hf1edfQCYuvk/KIgKJIBd0fdOStfhqBQo NxJ0qMM86BqQzfb53XFV7GgzIKgYz3VB/qrmdpThNIuprtyG3ZvDiH1FeTHXW80zWMBq x/uFLBOO8DtKU/MuPTJljG1hJ0qZADINe8RF92cHdDUwQCONgyrQ4g032nx7gfFf4e9S knJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:subject:in-reply-to:cc:from:to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BtuBGK4t/FRFS+JgAekun0SML2az4OmXyKU6ZI8gNZg=; b=sAzxMt+Tk1lX3/fBN6VmHdrdtzsUMVKncXbwC3fXrAEWceThBEGrJj8LIUMf+rJNPa Favucupp8ZTjhoQKHOQ6SJ4y0R9wh4YSCL+oPPrhydEzjKiUfqzq2d0bA1XOEa/WufC2 qoBgWWs+xk2dlYmJ3N4fwtFbZOEQQHKHmjL88QOvc+AgbTbpfUwvDirVjmQ5twJSLwly vb5gfc2yuBfw5WWKJ0PPe9xT3pQNvxBMUa8r/v6i8Sd60OLcx3KTT58IG6iaKQAecY+c dEgWGQA1m16N0telbhyVWHkDuNCQ+Ruonsv+VvoiHGWbx4kFvDpnIJIOMJehdnHldeza f4Sw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5315XWt+rWvCcry81X1MUClk2KaWJHXYVS4rBgtEk0AH4gBCev2Y mUu/KSR1C9Y4D5ZX9alU54SLtQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzgoJQz8ruIf6+m/8Ju1Kfv15+n4PqoJoax44ao40xxXmsbByEBvfDpklAgxMVVkhA2UdXnyw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:e981:: with SMTP id v1mr7759910pjy.130.1595388566029; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 20:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (76-210-143-223.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [76.210.143.223]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z20sm3802961pjr.43.2020.07.21.20.29.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 21 Jul 2020 20:29:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 20:29:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 20:24:19 PDT (-0700) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: pgtable: Make generic pgprot_* macros available for no-MMU In-Reply-To: From: Palmer Dabbelt To: penberg@gmail.com Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200721_232928_563476_D98F41D6 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.75 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: thomas.lendacky@amd.com, rppt@linux.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, rientjes@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 23:14:10 PDT (-0700), penberg@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Pekka Enberg wrote: >> > From: Pekka Enberg >> > >> > The header defines some generic pgprot_* >> > implementations, but they are only available when CONFIG_MMU is enabled. >> > The RISC-V architecture, for example, therefore defines some of these >> > pgprot_* macros for !NOMMU. >> > >> > Let's make the pgprot_* generic available even for !NOMMU so we can >> > remove the RISC-V specific definitions. >> > >> > Compile-tested with x86 defconfig, and riscv defconfig and !MMU defconfig. >> > >> > Suggested-by: Palmer Dabbelt >> > Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport >> > Cc: Tom Lendacky >> > Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 8:39 PM David Rientjes wrote: >> Acked-by: David Rientjes > > Palmer, will you pick up these patches in the riscv tree, or should I > ask Andrew to queue them in -mm? I just put them on for-next. Thanks! _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E715C433E4 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 03:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52C7206D7 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 03:30:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="Ef1yT7HO" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D52C7206D7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 21E1B6B0003; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 23:30:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 1CE796B0005; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 23:30:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 09A416B0006; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 23:30:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0205.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.205]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E452E6B0003 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 23:30:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin08.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5CA1812A47D for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 03:30:05 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77064283170.08.seat05_3c11b9726f32 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE0418092F11 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 03:29:27 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: seat05_3c11b9726f32 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4232 Received: from mail-pl1-f194.google.com (mail-pl1-f194.google.com [209.85.214.194]) by imf46.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 03:29:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pl1-f194.google.com with SMTP id k4so268629pld.12 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 20:29:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:subject:in-reply-to:cc:from:to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BtuBGK4t/FRFS+JgAekun0SML2az4OmXyKU6ZI8gNZg=; b=Ef1yT7HOSIyfdHphlAeHPa8Dt7+28NzF/D74RHSureRr5KDZYFOeIngq2sq1Z5QhsA GiA0QnWzeCkAHVvPEN7FCT29Rfs0LWIMvkquJw+u/KpGVmXxOR3opj/fkh0CSa+7M1bg 6YhvWj1TrPadHvIjdcFuyCHaKQO0mTnUEu6Hf1edfQCYuvk/KIgKJIBd0fdOStfhqBQo NxJ0qMM86BqQzfb53XFV7GgzIKgYz3VB/qrmdpThNIuprtyG3ZvDiH1FeTHXW80zWMBq x/uFLBOO8DtKU/MuPTJljG1hJ0qZADINe8RF92cHdDUwQCONgyrQ4g032nx7gfFf4e9S knJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:subject:in-reply-to:cc:from:to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BtuBGK4t/FRFS+JgAekun0SML2az4OmXyKU6ZI8gNZg=; b=YgJZns5nQSKxvaFXJzGZRGp/dwmPgIL1skIburmH1f74fViHjvX2mIs0di1Nz+YJo6 fJTgypYWO0DQXuv4Zmuz4OGsMtycR6SvOnHrPG8a7T/gBjXwTGJAgbaNtH/SM2s6WepU XGQXGyyo/2ETQTfkdIJlWbrb5FuJn8rC0j7TYr+aamqqSkqWJ0blWKB5aFOzT50EM/9d X6gVOXIuUVB64ayrEPeBlToThCg89teEHqBT/1NvLBl5s36der6GjN6LFp+dn8p5BbfS XgVxi49BEUmNFoSkpsicP1QzPXGAk/F7ihNrPQHzEJsom+PXxYOH6Sc3Ia9T/MxHUb6z Eivg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5320RqEMstS6jMS+hBRdN/QxIL6tggkYX5YJoahpn3n3zsIj/9QS VvmV6Fl5lVThcpIDUxBC6rftZw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzgoJQz8ruIf6+m/8Ju1Kfv15+n4PqoJoax44ao40xxXmsbByEBvfDpklAgxMVVkhA2UdXnyw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:e981:: with SMTP id v1mr7759910pjy.130.1595388566029; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 20:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (76-210-143-223.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [76.210.143.223]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z20sm3802961pjr.43.2020.07.21.20.29.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 21 Jul 2020 20:29:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 20:29:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 20:24:19 PDT (-0700) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: pgtable: Make generic pgprot_* macros available for no-MMU In-Reply-To: CC: rientjes@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com From: Palmer Dabbelt To: penberg@gmail.com Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: AFE0418092F11 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000001, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 23:14:10 PDT (-0700), penberg@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Pekka Enberg wrote: >> > From: Pekka Enberg >> > >> > The header defines some generic pgprot_* >> > implementations, but they are only available when CONFIG_MMU is enab= led. >> > The RISC-V architecture, for example, therefore defines some of thes= e >> > pgprot_* macros for !NOMMU. >> > >> > Let's make the pgprot_* generic available even for !NOMMU so we can >> > remove the RISC-V specific definitions. >> > >> > Compile-tested with x86 defconfig, and riscv defconfig and !MMU defc= onfig. >> > >> > Suggested-by: Palmer Dabbelt >> > Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport >> > Cc: Tom Lendacky >> > Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 8:39 PM David Rientjes wr= ote: >> Acked-by: David Rientjes > > Palmer, will you pick up these patches in the riscv tree, or should I > ask Andrew to queue them in -mm? I just put them on for-next. Thanks!