From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932145AbWDYIz6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 04:55:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932146AbWDYIz6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 04:55:58 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:4034 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932145AbWDYIz5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 04:55:57 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:55:56 +0200 From: Martin Mares To: David Schwartz Cc: "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" Subject: Re: C++ pushback Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I don't recall anyone asking you to so much as lift a finger. Feel free to > invest your effort where you feel it will do the most good, and try not to > criticize others for doing the same with their own resources. As far as they intend to stay away from the main kernel tree, I don't critize anybody. But for example renaming otherwise logically named structure members (`class' etc.) just for C++ compatibility _IS_ wasting time of other people, who need to remember new names, review the patch and so on. Have a nice fortnight -- Martin `MJ' Mares http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/ Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth If at first you don't succeed, redefine success.