From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: scar Subject: Re: moving spares into group and checking spares Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:19:03 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20160914092959.GA3584@metamorpher.de> <20160914232249.6e5fc568@natsu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: linux-raid-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Chris Murphy wrote on 09/14/2016 08:51 PM: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:42 PM, scar wrote: > >> 00 80 00 >> Sep 12 08:05:34 hind kernel: [1350051.023847] end_request: critical medium >> error, dev sdk, sector 598457896 >> Sep 12 08:05:35 hind kernel: [1350051.385810] md/raid:md0: read error >> corrected (8 sectors at 598455848 on sdk1) >> Sep 12 08:05:35 hind kernel: [1350051.385826] md/raid:md0: read error >> corrected (8 sectors at 598455856 on sdk1) >> Sep 12 08:05:35 hind kernel: [1350051.385834] md/raid:md0: read error >> corrected (8 sectors at 598455864 on sdk1) >> Sep 12 08:05:35 hind kernel: [1350051.385840] md/raid:md0: read error >> corrected (8 sectors at 598455872 on sdk1) >> Sep 12 08:05:35 hind kernel: [1350051.385847] md/raid:md0: read error >> corrected (8 sectors at 598455880 on sdk1) >> Sep 12 08:05:35 hind kernel: [1350051.385853] md/raid:md0: read error >> corrected (8 sectors at 598455888 on sdk1) >> Sep 12 08:05:35 hind kernel: [1350051.385859] md/raid:md0: read error >> corrected (8 sectors at 598455896 on sdk1) >> Sep 12 08:05:35 hind kernel: [1350051.385865] md/raid:md0: read error >> corrected (8 sectors at 598455904 on sdk1) >> Sep 12 08:05:35 hind kernel: [1350051.385873] md/raid:md0: read error >> corrected (8 sectors at 598455912 on sdk1) >> Sep 12 08:05:35 hind kernel: [1350051.385880] md/raid:md0: read error >> corrected (8 sectors at 598455920 on sdk1) >> Sep 12 13:39:43 hind kernel: [1370087.022160] md: md0: data-check done. >> >> >> so it seems to be working? although the sector reported by libata is >> different than what md corrected > > Looks like it replaced the entire chunk that includes the bad sector. > Is the chunk size 32KiB? > No it is 512K, and the sector reported by libata is almost 2000 sectors different than what mdadm reported -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html