Hi,

On Tue, 23 Oct 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >> To prevent that from happening, let's append `^0` after the stash hash,
> >> to make sure that it is interpreted as an OID rather than as a number.
> >
> > Oh, this is clever.
> 
> Yeah, we can do this as we know we'd be dealing with a commit-ish.
> If we made a mistake to use a tree object to represent a stash, this
> trick wouldn't have been possible ;-)
> 
> > FWIW, all patches look good to me, barring the typo below.
> > ...
> >> +	/* Ensure that the hash is not mistake for a number */
> >
> > s/mistake/mistaken/
> 
> Will squash this in and add your reviewed-by before queuing.
> 
> Thanks, both.

Thank you all!
Dscho