All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] build-in add -i: implement all commands in the main loop
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 19:53:43 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1911181940020.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqlfsd3omz.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

Hi Junio,

On Mon, 18 Nov 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
> writes:
>
> > ... there is so little overlap between the git add --patch part
> > and the rest of git add --interactive that I could put the former
> > into a totally different file: add-patch.c.
>
> We would want to call, after "add -i in C" stabilizes, directly into
> "add -p" machinery from different subcommands such as "reset",
> "checkout", etc., and bypass the rest of "add -i" when we do so.  We
> can credit the lack of overlap to the design that supports such
> usage while it is still in a scripted Porcelain.
>
> Preparing the "add -p" machinery in such a way that "add -i" merely
> is one of the users would make a lot of sense from organizational
> point of view.

If I understand you correctly, you mean that e.g. `git checkout -p` will
call the code from `add-patch.c` directly? That is indeed the case.
Already now, `git checkout -p` calls `run_add_interactive()` (see
https://github.com/git/git/blob/v2.24.0/builtin/checkout.c#L463):

	if (opts->patch_mode) {
		const char *patch_mode;


		if (opts->checkout_index && opts->checkout_worktree)
			patch_mode = "--patch=checkout";
		else if (opts->checkout_index && !opts->checkout_worktree)
			patch_mode = "--patch=reset";
		else if (!opts->checkout_index && opts->checkout_worktree)
			patch_mode = "--patch=worktree";
		else
			BUG("either flag must have been set, worktree=%d, index=%d",
			    opts->checkout_worktree, opts->checkout_index);
		return run_add_interactive(revision, patch_mode, &opts->pathspec);
	}

And with the changes in PR #174 (i.e. three patch series later, see
https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/174/files#diff-1f1eb09e4703764f9f9b9f1f1e67eb97R205-R218
for details), this will call `run_add_p()`, i.e. the newly-added code in
`add-patch.c` directly:

		if (!strcmp(patch_mode, "--patch"))
			mode = ADD_P_STAGE;
		else if (!strcmp(patch_mode, "--patch=stash"))
			mode = ADD_P_STASH;
		else if (!strcmp(patch_mode, "--patch=reset"))
			mode = ADD_P_RESET;
		else if (!strcmp(patch_mode, "--patch=checkout"))
			mode = ADD_P_CHECKOUT;
		else if (!strcmp(patch_mode, "--patch=worktree"))
			mode = ADD_P_WORKTREE;
		else
			die("'%s' not supported", patch_mode);

		return !!run_add_p(the_repository, mode, revision, pathspec);

Now that I see it, it does not look the most elegant that the
`patch_mode` is a string instead of that enum, but I think that will be
relatively easy to fix once the legacy `git-add--interactive.perl` will
have been decomissioned.

Ciao,
Dscho

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-18 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-15 12:36 [PATCH 0/8] build-in add -i: implement all commands in the main loop Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2019-11-15 12:36 ` [PATCH 1/8] built-in add -i: allow filtering the modified files list Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2019-11-21  8:06   ` Junio C Hamano
2019-11-25 15:20     ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-11-15 12:36 ` [PATCH 2/8] built-in add -i: prepare for multi-selection commands Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2019-11-21  8:12   ` Junio C Hamano
2019-11-25 15:21     ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-11-15 12:36 ` [PATCH 3/8] built-in add -i: implement the `update` command Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2019-11-15 12:36 ` [PATCH 4/8] built-in add -i: re-implement `revert` in C Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2019-11-15 12:36 ` [PATCH 5/8] built-in add -i: re-implement `add-untracked` " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2019-11-15 12:36 ` [PATCH 6/8] built-in add -i: implement the `patch` command Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2019-11-15 12:36 ` [PATCH 7/8] built-in add -i: re-implement the `diff` command Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2019-11-15 12:36 ` [PATCH 8/8] built-in add -i: offer the `quit` command Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2019-11-18  2:17 ` [PATCH 0/8] build-in add -i: implement all commands in the main loop Junio C Hamano
2019-11-18  2:22   ` Junio C Hamano
2019-11-18 19:22     ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-11-18  2:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-11-18 18:53   ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2019-11-19  1:29     ` Junio C Hamano
2019-11-29 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] built-in " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2019-11-29 21:11   ` [PATCH v2 1/9] add-interactive: make sure to release `rev.prune_data` Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2019-11-29 21:11   ` [PATCH v2 2/9] built-in add -i: allow filtering the modified files list Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2019-11-29 21:11   ` [PATCH v2 3/9] built-in add -i: prepare for multi-selection commands Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2019-11-29 21:11   ` [PATCH v2 4/9] built-in add -i: implement the `update` command Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2019-11-29 21:11   ` [PATCH v2 5/9] built-in add -i: re-implement `revert` in C Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2019-11-29 21:11   ` [PATCH v2 6/9] built-in add -i: re-implement `add-untracked` " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2019-11-29 21:11   ` [PATCH v2 7/9] built-in add -i: implement the `patch` command Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2019-11-29 21:11   ` [PATCH v2 8/9] built-in add -i: re-implement the `diff` command Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2019-11-29 21:11   ` [PATCH v2 9/9] built-in add -i: offer the `quit` command Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1911181940020.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet \
    --to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.