From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2052BC433EF for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 10:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047CC61037 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 10:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232827AbhJGLAX (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2021 07:00:23 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:53031 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232418AbhJGLAW (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2021 07:00:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1633604284; bh=qRsMhghD8+xSnYKZPtNihf7jb+0hehZNB8thgjaPW/Q=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=kQ1nmYTU4MgHzxBJNDF137NJKMoJAvHGQWBkFqV3ZI8ibBEvvhDYoSTDC81mKevGh 2nfts5IheYRUZTNbEd8xl6EqBpS/8PRZvF7y7APMC2hXY1R7r5VzLY+5JNXsq2BcSq /Df0TG4kWgtJruWinSa4G+iolSJtYqjhfaKekPi8= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [172.20.23.42] ([217.197.83.193]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MWASe-1mIRSz3FHu-00Xb8t; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 12:58:03 +0200 Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 12:58:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Johannes Schindelin X-X-Sender: virtualbox@gitforwindows.org To: Junio C Hamano cc: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=86var_Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0_Bjarmason?= , Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Derrick Stolee , Eric Sunshine , Elijah Newren , Bagas Sanjaya Subject: Re: Train station analogy, was Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] [RFC] Upstreaming the Scalar command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <87r1dydp4m.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <87ilz44kdk.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <87mtofnzv1.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.1 (DEB 209 2017-03-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:cjqbkKzRc9vQu9SBKWYP+BdXdNVMWV5MWQ9kcAsN3bvq308Ot+G uQ9hpQViE/qCd9Ao3y1vOhTF2jdfEf0jeL/VOXJiX3DwoPIbR8L4KlYnf37I5KjmJfF9wW0 VzHpOyQ0qsSma6j2cz4NK4PB4AjRPzkpa2gpHbilF/Edq75w/3c5reL5YrQT3u5TJGLcUuu Ys8ZmdZfk0LxRoli0HPZQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:WohB3CF8UEU=:6nWyUbHCNljN/5E7lBaQry hwPNhDpyNKvy2pJEF5mhrXCuEL/Cbzcj3YZQH2B8FPzLzTSk2u0LaSTz1RCrDsSgi38IFbs75 A0DPqhnKOdri6DbBRhSTa8cvHKBsFqf++DIEhx0MYqwD7f5jQN5q4Q84CdCmEPekITrHUZifi OMs9FEg9rHomq92AtZUr+WelXzUPbPW7hV32JFC9l0a+UralEn1m0ff2YDvJMJT9JTJmSnUQE IWquFGXw7Z2dxaFvasPcJ+nEbNEvT+rxmhOzxBo/QZT6wGaQlcGf6tWvcGx1FdTV8mcNa4X+5 bDG4OveFDsiyc3Wiej6ZfOArggfk0o1ON/383c+oSm4ayK83d4Gt4aVv/S06f3sJKSsi70F+h vsUk6i9Gl61updpqhU30SU4LvMtvIBkBByEYU95CLPekhvjKHngsGaDB5f1tfCsXrSXvf6umU 8v0HbnLpMkQSuqvYknfk4mT880lHXKpyhlGIEcXRHQBSI2RmWz8CEPAQKiKiz+qdSC7RWolV3 nTpamsxJr8e6eITiETBpVStyb55W3kqAh8/0ZhIojrGBb+mNhkKrIrJXW894tCqGE7On2MU0K V2UvbXP3Ld8xJK3lEodK03oqvILUkNEXLA/JGs64n7MNjTK72I3nPtiwV/EjGMbeUW7Hx0HtC lZCkz62sf9VDx1BskX1xI3RqeDxocYwCGvn+nwpcRLGpRDH7NBEOouhzvGEEbmcmhqABb/ZN8 5meER5nyfEcvB+kTmIhKdwLJXoBETCU0JWF1Xe1Jtj3eSV8AzGgrHvghCpAUK4WsmpGRTbiFg hFunByNNoozk/MmIPw7Bhb7NrRs0oHNLEYqi5QePJ8xWJR/HmFU2v1nm6SAgC8VNmpqTodxsV El156dmYiLAXMxp4cTyt3Lps6yUjkR6+rKhCZ5Ff5GAtjvt0V0S4NCxd9bvLxUwCVAiCaVway hMWMXSYlrVrGZCzrjBbg7ttKZd5n/xWsGJ1c5pb/nayEtdGQxh7jDIWssnOHFJUsOTBrYtTsa J7ItPEbmMOhoFFvK4cYB/48zedCjF0zlbxfiKmOw04wfji2xS9ifz0VC9dLuMK84mh9lFFaz7 /2yAMdBVzHwdrI= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi Junio, On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > I don't think that there is a lot of sense in that. The main benefits = of > > `scalar` are in the `register` and the `clone` part, and the most natu= ral > > end game would hence be for `git init` and `git clone` to sprout new > > options to support Scalar's features, in a Git-native way. > > Yes, that is even better. An endgame where everybody benefits > natively would be highly desirable. I am glad that this question is now resolved. > Now you are back, do you think we can have the "no more preserve > merges backend" topic graduate to 'master', or do you prefer to cook > it over the cycle (or even two)? I did not see _any_ problems with it, so I'd be in favor of promoting it to `master`. But if you want to play the game more carefully, I would be fine with that, too. Ciao, Dscho