From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (146.0.238.70:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 20 Feb 2019 22:50:52 -0000 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15] helo=mx1.suse.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1gwahV-0003Mv-Rp for speck@linutronix.de; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 23:50:50 +0100 Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648AEB606 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 22:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 23:50:36 +0100 (CET) From: Jiri Kosina Subject: [MODERATED] Re: [patch V2 09/10] MDS basics+ 9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20190220150753.665964899@linutronix.de> <20190220151400.787843957@linutronix.de> <20190220162128.GW32477@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Wed, 20 Feb 2019, speck for Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > And change the jmp at 1 between: JMP 3f, JMP 2f and NOP for > > mds={off,full,cond} resp. > > Right. That'd be cute, but for backporting sake we should stick with the > tools we have now. Thomas, thanks a lot for taking this into consideration. It'd indeed be an annoyingly big issue for us. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs