From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Learner Study Subject: Re: Linux Raid performance Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 03:07:43 -0700 Message-ID: References: <4BB69670.3040303@sauce.co.nz> <4BB7856C.30808@shiftmail.org> <4BB79D76.7090206@sauce.co.nz> <4BB8A979.3020502@shiftmail.org> <1270416495.25890.3.camel@travelmate.workshop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Knecht Cc: jools@oxfordinspire.co.uk, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, learner.study@gmail.com List-Id: linux-raid.ids Hi Mark, all: My apologies if I sounded like a pest by asking too many questions...Since I don't have access to array of disks, I sought to the list to see if I could use the info already out there instead of reinventing it...how well suited is linux raid for 10G kind of traffic..I don't have resources to check it myself and thought of asking for help/guidance! Thanks! On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: > On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Jools Wills wrote: >> On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 11:46 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: >> >>> Are you just trolling or something? Why are you asking about non-linux >>> RAID on a Linux software RAID list? >> >> Don't want to start any flame war, but I had no problem with the mail, >> and it seemed a relevant question. After all, we need to compare against >> other systems to remain on top right? to strive to be the best? >> >> If platform A and B is doing XYZ in terms of raid, then it is surely up >> for discussion. I think such attitudes like this make people think we >> are fanatical, rather than educated developers trying to improve things. >> >> Best Regards >> >> Jools >> >> Jools Wills >> -- >> IT Consultant >> Oxford Inspire - http://www.oxfordinspire.co.uk - be inspired >> t: 01235 519446 m: 07966 577498 >> jools@oxfordinspire.co.uk >> >> > > You are right. There wasn't anything wrong with the questionas asked > and it was not my intent to start any wars. My apologies if it sounded > that way. > > My reading of this thread in total has been pretty much that the OP > doesn't know much about RAID (fair enough), or PC architecture (fair > enough) and wants to ask little questions over and over to get > information without doing much work on his own. (possibly not so > fair.) I should just shut my mouth and let the messages go by which I > will do with this individual from here on out. > > My apologies, > Mark >