Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] u_char.c and mtp.c patches

["Michał Nazarewicz" <m.nazarewicz@samsung.com>]

>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 06:55:53PM +0200, Michał Nazarewicz wrote:
>>> On related news, I've just posted FunctionFS driver. :) It's still imperfect
>>> but appears to be working.

> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 07:15:34PM +0200, ext Greg KH wrote:
>> Yes, that should solve the gadgetfs issue for you, right Felipe?

On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:24:04 +0200, Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@nokia.com> wrote:
> sure it should. Will take a look at it :-)

As I've said it's still imperfect.  In particular the throughput won't be
impressive but that's on the TODO list (I first want to put a real driver
on top of FunctionFS before optimising the code) and in particular u_char
seem to be a good piece to steal code from. ;)  Still, as said, I haven't
analysed possible optimisations just yet.

All in all, I believe FunctionFS can work for you as you will handle data
transfers in user space anyway.  At the same time FunctionFS solves evens
end setup requests communication (I'm still wondering whether it would be
better to use separate file for events and for setup requests).

-- 
Best regards,                                           _     _
  .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of       o' \,=./ `o
  ..o | Computer Science,  Michał "mina86" Nazarewicz     (o o)
  ooo +---[mina86@mina86.com]---[mina86@jabber.org]---ooO--(_)--Ooo--