From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932253Ab0FIPwZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2010 11:52:25 -0400 Received: from mailout2.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.12]:33990 "EHLO mailout2.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751594Ab0FIPwX convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2010 11:52:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:53:09 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBOYXphcmV3aWN6?= Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 08/13] USB: gadget: g_serial: INF file updated In-reply-to: <20100609153351.GB21431@kroah.com> To: Greg KH Cc: Xiaofan Chen , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, David Brownell , David Brownell , Kyungmin Park , Marek Szyprowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-id: Organization: Samsung Electronics MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.53 (Linux) References: <996015.66352.qm@web180311.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <20100609145946.GB20543@kroah.com> <20100609153351.GB21431@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:33:51 +0200, Greg KH wrote: >> The RNDIS template was taken from: >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff570620.aspx >> >> The CDC ACM was sent by Xiaofan Chen who said that it is probably >> taken indirectly form MSDN as well. > > Ok, and not from the Windows DDK, right? That has a different license > than MSDN. RNDIS is from MSDN for sure. As of serial, I couldn't find it there. >> The MSDN TOS reads: >> >If Microsoft makes any code marked as “sample” available on this >> >Web Site without a License Agreement, then that code is licensed >> >to you under the terms of the Microsoft Limited Public License. >> >> Where the MLPL can be found at: >> . It seems like >> a perfectly legal free software license except point 3(F): >> >> >(F) Platform Limitation- The licenses granted in sections 2(A) & 2(B) >> >extend only to the software or derivative works that you create that >> >run on a Microsoft Windows operating system product. >> >> Also, 3(D) requires that the whole license is included: >> >(D) If you distribute any portion of the software in source code form, >> >you may do so only under this license by including a complete copy of >> >this license with your distribution. If you distribute any portion of >> >the software in compiled or object code form, you may only do so under >> >a license that complies with this license. >> >> Therefore, shall we include the license along with the INFs and ignore >> the fact it's not fully free software? > No, it's not "software" here, and it is abiding by the license of the > MLPL as you don't run that file on any non-Windows machine. Well... According to the license (if we assume the license apply to the INF template) it is "software": > This license governs use of code marked as “sample” available on this > Web Site without a License Agreement , as provided under the Section > above titled “NOTICE SPECIFIC TO SOFTWARE AVAILABLE ON THIS WEB SITE”. > If you use such code (the “software”), you accept this license. On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:33:51 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > How about putting the following on the file: > ; based on a example .inf file that was: > ; Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation > ; and released under the MLPL as found at > ; http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/cc300389.aspx#MLPL > ; For use only on Windows operating systems. > ; > > Interesting that they don't put a date on the copyright. > > With that wording, I'd be glad to take it. If no one sees any legal issues here I can change the patch accordingly. I'm more and more confused by the whole issue. ;) -- Best regards, _ _ | Humble Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o | Computer Science, Michał "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o) +----[mina86*mina86.com]---[mina86*jabber.org]----ooO--(_)--Ooo--