From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754533Ab1FOJ0y (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:26:54 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:42898 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754009Ab1FOJ0w (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:26:52 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:content-type:to:cc:subject:references:date:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=jUdbt9EUwLTaIYy0c8WkOsFaxj6pr1ookXb87HhKbzOFJSIrCvHNQA2BMW92iGhHoq lbEdAzJ8W5FDyE2IQK+sv51SYTecJANuopYyPyLjc2tESnmX2RO9ARPORlASUxBM/Rch FGhDh9/zRLCNjsREn7dDi9YoHulrTiFC0z1bU= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "Zach Pfeffer" , "Arnd Bergmann" Cc: "Daniel Stone" , "Ankita Garg" , "Daniel Walker" , "Jesse Barker" , "Mel Gorman" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, "Kyungmin Park" , "KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" , "Andrew Morton" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 08/10] mm: cma: Contiguous Memory Allocator added References: <1307699698-29369-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <20110614170158.GU2419@fooishbar.org> <201106142242.25157.arnd@arndb.de> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:26:47 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Michal Nazarewicz" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <201106142242.25157.arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.10 (Linux) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:42:24 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > * We still need to solve the same problem in case of IOMMU mappings > at some point, even if today's hardware doesn't have this combination. > It would be good to use the same solution for both. I don't think I follow. What does IOMMU has to do with CMA? -- Best regards, _ _ .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o ..o | Computer Science, Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o) ooo +----------ooO--(_)--Ooo-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail143.messagelabs.com (mail143.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465716B0012 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:26:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fxm18 with SMTP id 18so340001fxm.14 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:26:51 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Subject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 08/10] mm: cma: Contiguous Memory Allocator added References: <1307699698-29369-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <20110614170158.GU2419@fooishbar.org> <201106142242.25157.arnd@arndb.de> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:26:47 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Michal Nazarewicz" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <201106142242.25157.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Zach Pfeffer , Arnd Bergmann Cc: Daniel Stone , Ankita Garg , Daniel Walker , Jesse Barker , Mel Gorman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Kyungmin Park , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Andrew Morton , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:42:24 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > * We still need to solve the same problem in case of IOMMU mappings > at some point, even if today's hardware doesn't have this combination. > It would be good to use the same solution for both. I don't think I follow. What does IOMMU has to do with CMA? -- Best regards, _ _ .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o ..o | Computer Science, Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o) ooo +----------ooO--(_)--Ooo-- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mina86@mina86.com (Michal Nazarewicz) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:26:47 +0200 Subject: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 08/10] mm: cma: Contiguous Memory Allocator added In-Reply-To: <201106142242.25157.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1307699698-29369-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <20110614170158.GU2419@fooishbar.org> <201106142242.25157.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:42:24 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > * We still need to solve the same problem in case of IOMMU mappings > at some point, even if today's hardware doesn't have this combination. > It would be good to use the same solution for both. I don't think I follow. What does IOMMU has to do with CMA? -- Best regards, _ _ .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o ..o | Computer Science, Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o) ooo +----------ooO--(_)--Ooo--