From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Imre Kaloz" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Convert Netgear WNR854T to devicetree Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:09:42 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1468679348-10522-1-git-send-email-jm@lentin.co.uk> <1472203264-21089-1-git-send-email-jm@lentin.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1472203264-21089-1-git-send-email-jm@lentin.co.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Andrew Lunn , Arnd Bergmann , Rob Herring , Vivien Didelot , Jason Cooper , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Gregory Clement , Jamie Lentin Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Jamie, On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:20:56 +0200, Jamie Lentin wrote: > * Use Flash partition scheme from original netgear Linux image (but > keeping the uboot/uboot_env split) instead of the partition scheme from > the old non-DT support, which didn't match either Netgear's layout, > u-boot or openWRT. NB: I've no copy of the original flash contents > (Netgear's firmware images only contain a squashfs image of the rootfs), > so I can't confirm the other partitions are accurately named. Both the factory layout and OpenWrt's changed a few times - the later just to accommodate bigger kernels. Some factory firmwares did include a kernel update, too. I would suggest staying with the OpenWrt layour (maybe increase again the size of the kernel partition): - the bootloader loads the kernel from JFFS2 - most of the partitions in the factory firmware are empty - the factory layout gives you almost no space to play with But this is up to you now :) Best, Imre From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kaloz@openwrt.org (Imre Kaloz) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:09:42 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/8] Convert Netgear WNR854T to devicetree In-Reply-To: <1472203264-21089-1-git-send-email-jm@lentin.co.uk> References: <1468679348-10522-1-git-send-email-jm@lentin.co.uk> <1472203264-21089-1-git-send-email-jm@lentin.co.uk> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Jamie, On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:20:56 +0200, Jamie Lentin wrote: > * Use Flash partition scheme from original netgear Linux image (but > keeping the uboot/uboot_env split) instead of the partition scheme from > the old non-DT support, which didn't match either Netgear's layout, > u-boot or openWRT. NB: I've no copy of the original flash contents > (Netgear's firmware images only contain a squashfs image of the rootfs), > so I can't confirm the other partitions are accurately named. Both the factory layout and OpenWrt's changed a few times - the later just to accommodate bigger kernels. Some factory firmwares did include a kernel update, too. I would suggest staying with the OpenWrt layour (maybe increase again the size of the kernel partition): - the bootloader loads the kernel from JFFS2 - most of the partitions in the factory firmware are empty - the factory layout gives you almost no space to play with But this is up to you now :) Best, Imre