Re: [Xenomai] Xenomai 3.0-rc3 Interruption on Arietta G25 (AT91SAM9G25 chip)

[Paul Janzen <pcj@xenomai.sez.to>]

Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org> writes:
>> I'm simply suggesting that xenomai mailman be configured to include
>> this header. Then people would have to consciously edit header fields
>> to send to your private account only.
>
> No, the mailman documentation recommends against that, it is a
> recipe for sending private mails to the list unintentionally, which
> is way worse than the opposite.

Your responses to those who make the trivial mistake of clicking on
"reply" rather than "reply all" seem to indicate that you believe
otherwise.

The rationale behind the mailman developers' stance against Reply-To:
is that users should be encouraged to choose either to reply to the
original sender's personal address, or to the entire list.  This is
the opposite of the stated policy of the xenomai list.

If you personally do not want replies sent only to your personal
address, then feel free to configure your MUA to insert your own
Reply-To: header.  If you want to maximize the amount of
xenomai-related traffic captured in the digests, configure mailman to
do it.

-- Paul