From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:52862 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750892AbaBMUWr (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:22:47 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WE2o1-0002MC-3M for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:22:45 +0100 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:22:45 +0100 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:22:45 +0100 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] Add command btrfs filesystem disk-usage Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:22:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: References: <52FD1AD6.50500@libero.it> <20140214012810.26297146@natsu> <52FD21B4.4050502@libero.it> Goffredo Baroncelli posted on Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:49:08 +0100 as excerpted: > Thanks for the comments, however I don't like du not usage; but you are > right when you don't like "disk-usage". What about "btrfs filesystem > chunk-usage" ? The short form would be > > btrfs fi chunk > > which is coherent with the data displayed That makes much more sense from a different perspective as well. "Disk" sounds so 20th-century spinning rust..., and at least to me, "du" isn't as intuitive or commonly used as "df", so while "df" seems natural to me, while I understand where "du" comes from, it still makes me go "huh?" as I wouldn't expect to see it in the btrfs context. So btrfs filesystem chunk(-usage), please. =:^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman