From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:55731 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751485AbbKXG4x (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2015 01:56:53 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a17Wy-0000uw-TQ for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 07:56:48 +0100 Received: from ip98-167-165-199.ph.ph.cox.net ([98.167.165.199]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 07:56:48 +0100 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip98-167-165-199.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 07:56:48 +0100 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: Re: shall distros run btrfsck on boot? Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 06:56:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1448337754.14125.33.camel@scientia.net> <1448340211.14125.44.camel@scientia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Duncan posted on Tue, 24 Nov 2015 06:46:18 +0000 as excerpted: > That wouldn't be entirely uncommon, because as Eric mentions, btrfs > check is intended to be thorough, where the kernel mount-time check is > intended to be fast. > > But of course, as Eric also mentions, that's yet another reason you > don't want btrfs check running at boot... it's *SSLLLOOWWWWW*, because > it's being thorough. Oops! Mis-attribution. Qu not Eric. (I had read both replies in my email but only saw Eric's on the list, which I read in my news client via gmane's list2news service, when I composed the above. So I presumed the points I remembered being made were from Eric's post, when it was Qu's.) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman