All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra" <lgcdutra@terra.com.br>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Switching to the OSL License, in a dual way.
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 21:46:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2003.07.26.19.46.27.632068@terra.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030726192322.GA24865@work.bitmover.com

On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 12:23:22 -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:

> I can't tell if we are in agreement or not.  As far as I've been
> able to tell disallowing reverse engineering is not allowed in some
> countries if and only if the application does not provide documented
> ways to interoperate with the application.  People have tried to claim
> otherwise but every time we've dug into we've found the laws to be pretty
> reasonable and balanced.

	I find quite amusing your notion of reason and balance.  Or
rather sad...


> They tend to have the view "if you are being
> a jerk and locking people into your application with no way to get at
> their data, then of course reverse engineering is allowed, how else are
> people to get at their data?  On the other hand, if you are being nice
> and you provide documented ways for people to get at their data then
> reverse engineering is not allowed".  Which seems to make sense, right?

	No.  Reverse engineering is first a way of learning, then a
safeguard... if you need to learn (for there are no docs) and if you
need a safeguard (for you can't trust the vendor), then you need the
possibility of cloning.  Both of these conditions are much more likely
present in non-free software.  If both of them are fulfilled, it is
also very likely one will need to create a clone, but not necessarily
so.

	That you get so jumpy at the mere mention of reverse
engineering should have rang bells everywhere long time ago, not only
at the FSF proverbial HQ.


> If corporations aren't trying to lock you into their products then they
> ought to be able to enjoy some fruits from their labors without people
> coping their work.

	I assume you meant copying.

	No one is threatening to copy your source code.  People only want to
create a clone, not a copy: something that interoperates with the same
data structures, perhaps with the same user interfaces.

	Perhaps you are claiming the definition of protocols and data
structures as protected by copyright.  Perhaps, but it doesn't make
cloning less moral.  Laws and morals unfortunately are splitting
farther and farther.


-- 
 _   Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra     +41 (21) 648 11 34
/ \  http://br.geocities.com./lgcdutra/         +41 (78) 778 11 34
\ /  Answer to the list, not to me directly!    +55 (11) 5686 2219
/ \  Rate this if helpful: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=leandro



  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-26 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-24  8:40 Switching to the OSL License, in a dual way Dean McEwan
2003-07-24  8:58 ` Miles Bader
2003-07-24  9:46   ` Andre Hedrick
2003-07-24 18:06     ` Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
2003-07-24 20:02       ` Andre Hedrick
2003-07-24 21:05         ` Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
2003-07-24 21:57           ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-24 22:24             ` Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
2003-07-25  9:56             ` Gaël Le Mignot
2003-07-25 14:39               ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-26  2:52                 ` Matthias Andree
2003-07-26  3:18                   ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-25 13:17             ` Jesse Pollard
2003-07-25 14:55               ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-25 15:15                 ` Gaël Le Mignot
2003-07-25 15:33                   ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-07-26 19:10             ` Rik van Riel
2003-07-26 19:23               ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-26 19:46                 ` Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra [this message]
2003-07-26 20:01                   ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-26 21:08                     ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-07-26 20:21                 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2003-07-24  9:05 ` Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
2003-07-27  9:21   ` Kai Henningsen
2003-07-24 11:30 ` viro
2003-07-24 10:35 Samium Gromoff
2003-07-24 11:51 Dean McEwan
2003-07-24 22:25 ` Stefan Reinauer
2003-07-25  9:34 Samium Gromoff
2003-07-25 13:27 ` Gaël Le Mignot
2003-07-25 15:33 John Bradford
2003-07-25 15:36 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-07-26 19:46 Hank Leininger
2003-07-26 20:20 John Bradford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=pan.2003.07.26.19.46.27.632068@terra.com.br \
    --to=lgcdutra@terra.com.br \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.