From: "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Btrfs-progs-3.16: fs metadata is both single and dup?
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 12:05:33 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2014.09.02.12.05.33@googlemail.com> (raw)
I updated to progs-3.16 and noticed during testing:
root>losetup
NAME SIZELIMIT OFFSET AUTOCLEAR RO BACK-FILE
/dev/loop0 0 0 0 0 /tmp/img
root>mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/loop0
Btrfs v3.16
See http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org for more information.
Performing full device TRIM (8.00GiB) ...
Turning ON incompat feature 'extref': increased hardlink limit per file
to 65536
fs created label (null) on /dev/loop0
nodesize 16384 leafsize 16384 sectorsize 4096 size 8.00GiB
root>mkdir /tmp/btrfs
root>mount /dev/loop0 /tmp/btrfs
All fine until here..
root>btrfs filesystem df /tmp/btrfs
Data, single: total=8.00MiB, used=64.00KiB
System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00
Metadata, DUP: total=409.56MiB, used=112.00KiB
Metadata, single: total=8.00MiB, used=0.00
..wait, what? Let's be clear..
root>btrfs balance start -mconvert=dup /tmp/btrfs
Done, had to relocate 4 out of 5 chunks
root>btrfs filesystem df /tmp/btrfs
Data, single: total=8.00MiB, used=64.00KiB
System, DUP: total=32.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
Metadata, DUP: total=128.00MiB, used=112.00KiB
Now looking as expected.
root>btrfs balance start -mconvert=single -f /tmp/btrfs
Done, had to relocate 2 out of 3 chunks
root>btrfs filesystem df /tmp/btrfs
Data, single: total=8.00MiB, used=128.00KiB
System, single: total=32.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
Metadata, single: total=256.00MiB, used=112.00KiB
Looking good too (metadata doubled)
So where does the confusing initial display come from? I'm running this
against a (very patched) 3.14.17, but don't remember ever seeing this
with btrfs-progs-3.14.2.
Any ideas?
thanks
Holger
next reply other threads:[~2014-09-02 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-02 12:05 Holger Hoffstätte [this message]
2014-09-02 12:13 ` Btrfs-progs-3.16: fs metadata is both single and dup? Hugo Mills
2014-09-02 12:34 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2014-09-03 4:53 ` Duncan
2014-09-03 7:33 ` Hugo Mills
2014-09-03 8:41 ` Duncan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=pan.2014.09.02.12.05.33@googlemail.com \
--to=holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.