From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:36599 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753140AbaIBMe2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Sep 2014 08:34:28 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XOnI1-000134-Ah for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 14:34:25 +0200 Received: from pd953e79b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.83.231.155]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 14:34:25 +0200 Received: from holger.hoffstaette by pd953e79b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 14:34:25 +0200 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Holger =?iso-8859-1?q?Hoffst=E4tte?= Subject: Re: Btrfs-progs-3.16: fs metadata is both single and dup? Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 12:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20140902121349.GF18897@carfax.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:13:49 +0100, Hugo Mills wrote: > [snip] >> So where does the confusing initial display come from? I'm running this >> against a (very patched) 3.14.17, but don't remember ever seeing this >> with btrfs-progs-3.14.2. > > Your memory is faulty, I'm afraid. It's always done that -- at After 40 it's all downhill.. :-) > least since I started using btrfs, several years ago. Alright then. I was just getting nervous I might have borked something either with my kernel or that the new progs somehow get information from the kernel that is off/wrong. All my other filesystems display as expected, but they have been balanced previously - so nothing to see there. Thanks! Holger