All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Lautrbach <plautrba@redhat.com>
To: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Petr Lautrbach <plautrba@redhat.com>,
	Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@m4x.org>,
	Dan Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dbus: Fix name of polkit function
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 10:09:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pjdmun8x8v1.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfZ7=kYgvh3QeXBzWbMcjMuSKt1VaGkaxj=xiJ_0PFsihhPMQ@mail.gmail.com>


Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@m4x.org> writes:

> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 8:42 PM Petr Lautrbach 
> <plautrba@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Dan Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Petr Lautrbach <plautrba@redhat.com>
>
> Hi,
> As I am unfamiliar with D-Bus code, I try to understand what is 
> the
> nature of this change (is-it a bugfix, an improvement, something
> else?). Here are the facts:
>
> - Currently, dbus/selinux_server.py uses «
> @slip.dbus.polkit.require_auth("org.selinux.change_default_mode") 
> »
> for function « change_default_mode ».
> - "org.selinux.change_default_mode" does not exist, and I do not 
> know
> whether that means that some kind of default policykit policy 
> gets
> applied.
> - "org.selinux.change_policy_type" is defined in
> dbus/org.selinux.policy, without any user.
> - The commit that introduced dbus/selinux_server.py (commit
> e6a1298e5421 ("These are massive changes involved in building 
> new
> GUI.")) added a function named « change_default_mode », without 
> any
> specific policykit access checking.
> - Commit e8718ef51463 ("Make sure we do the polkit check on all 
> dbus
> interfaces.") added «
> @slip.dbus.polkit.require_auth("org.selinux.change_default_mode") 
> » in
> policycoreutils/sepolicy/selinux_server.py.
>
> If I understand correctly, this last commit is buggy and should 
> have
> added "org.selinux.change_default_mode" to
> policycoreutils/sepolicy/org.selinux.policy. Therefore this new 
> patch
> fixes a bug and removes an unused policykit action. Is this 
> right? If
> yes, I suggest adding this to the commit description:
>
>     Add missing action org.selinux.change_default_mode for
> change_default_mode() and remove unused action
> org.selinux.change_policy_type.
>
>     Fixes: e8718ef51463 ("Make sure we do the polkit check on 
>     all dbus
> interfaces.")
>
> Would this be acceptable?

You are completely right and the new message makes sense. I'll 
resend
the patch with updated commit message.

Thanks!

>
>> ---
>>  dbus/org.selinux.policy | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/dbus/org.selinux.policy b/dbus/org.selinux.policy
>> index 01266102..9772127b 100644
>> --- a/dbus/org.selinux.policy
>> +++ b/dbus/org.selinux.policy
>> @@ -70,9 +70,9 @@
>>           <allow_active>auth_admin_keep</allow_active>
>>          </defaults>
>>      </action>
>> -    <action id="org.selinux.change_policy_type">
>> -        <description>SELinux write access</description>
>> -        <message>System policy prevents change_policy_type 
>> access to SELinux</message>
>> +    <action id="org.selinux.change_default_mode">
>> +        <description>Change SELinux default enforcing 
>> mode</description>
>> +        <message>System policy prevents change_default_policy 
>> access to SELinux</message>
>>          <defaults>
>>            <allow_any>no</allow_any>
>>            <allow_inactive>no</allow_inactive>
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-07  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-31 19:42 [PATCH] dbus: Fix name of polkit function Petr Lautrbach
2019-02-06 20:46 ` Nicolas Iooss
2019-02-07  9:09   ` Petr Lautrbach [this message]
2019-02-07  9:18     ` [PATCH v2] " Petr Lautrbach
2019-02-07 21:04       ` Nicolas Iooss
2019-02-10 16:49         ` Nicolas Iooss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=pjdmun8x8v1.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=plautrba@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwalsh@redhat.com \
    --cc=nicolas.iooss@m4x.org \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.