All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Lautrbach <plautrba@redhat.com>
To: SELinux <selinux@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RFC: introduce new library versions for added symbols
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:57:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pjdmuo8fl9s.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)

I used abi-compliance-checker [1] and compared the latest sources 
with 2.8 release [2].
It looks like there's one symbol added to audit2why.so.

Then I tried the same thing with 2.7 [3] and 2.6 [4] and noticed 
that
there were added new symbols even to LIBSEMANAGE_1.0 while since 
2.3
there's already LIBSEMANAGE_1.1.
It's a bug which breaks automatic dependency checking. So I 
propose
to fix symbol version mappings in order to be in relation with the
release where they was introduced, e.g. for libsemanage:

diff --git a/libsemanage/src/libsemanage.map 
b/libsemanage/src/libsemanage.map
index 02036696..45e90215 100644
--- a/libsemanage/src/libsemanage.map
+++ b/libsemanage/src/libsemanage.map
@@ -18,8 +18,6 @@ LIBSEMANAGE_1.0 {
          semanage_root;
          semanage_user_*; semanage_bool_*; semanage_seuser_*;
          semanage_iface_*; semanage_port_*; semanage_context_*;
-         semanage_ibpkey_*;
-         semanage_ibendport_*;
          semanage_node_*;
          semanage_fcontext_*; semanage_access_check; 
          semanage_set_create_store;
          semanage_is_connected; semanage_get_disable_dontaudit; 
          semanage_set_disable_dontaudit;
@@ -63,3 +61,19 @@ LIBSEMANAGE_1.1 {
          semanage_module_remove_key;
          semanage_set_store_root;
 } LIBSEMANAGE_1.0;
+
+LIBSEMANAGE_2.5 {
+  global:
+    semanage_module_extract;
+} LIBSEMANAGE_1.1;
+
+LIBSEMANAGE_2.7 {
+  global:
+         semanage_ibpkey_*;
+         semanage_ibendport_*;
+} LIBSEMANAGE_2.5;
+
+LIBSEMANAGE_2.8 {
+  global:
+    semanage_fcontext_list_homedirs;
+} LIBSEMANAGE_2.7;


If this is acceptable, I would prepare a patch with symbol 
versions
starting with 2.5 as LIBSEMANAGE_1.1 was introduced in 2.4.

[1] http://lvc.github.io/abi-compliance-checker/
[2] 
https://plautrba.fedorapeople.org/selinux/compat_reports/2.8_to_2.9-rc0/compat_report.html
[3] 
https://plautrba.fedorapeople.org/selinux/compat_reports/2.7_to_2.9-rc0/compat_report.html
[4] 
https://plautrba.fedorapeople.org/selinux/compat_reports/2.6_to_2.9-rc0/compat_report.html

Petr

             reply	other threads:[~2019-01-10 17:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-10 17:57 Petr Lautrbach [this message]
2019-01-10 18:13 ` RFC: introduce new library versions for added symbols Stephen Smalley
2019-01-11 12:24   ` Petr Lautrbach
2019-01-11 16:01     ` Stephen Smalley
2019-01-15 13:36       ` [PATCH] libselinux/audit2why.so: Filter out non-python related symbols Petr Lautrbach
2019-01-15 13:57         ` Stephen Smalley
2019-01-17 14:18         ` Stephen Smalley
2019-01-17 14:33           ` Stephen Smalley
2019-01-21 12:15             ` Petr Lautrbach
2019-01-24 11:09               ` Petr Lautrbach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=pjdmuo8fl9s.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=plautrba@redhat.com \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.