From: "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> To: git@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Derrick Stolee" <dstolee@microsoft.com>, "Jonathan Tan" <jonathantanmy@google.com>, "Taylor Blau" <me@ttaylorr.com>, "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>, "Elijah Newren" <newren@gmail.com>, "Elijah Newren" <newren@gmail.com> Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] Optimization batch 12: miscellaneous unthemed stuff Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 14:58:30 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <pull.962.v2.git.1622559516.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <pull.962.git.1622104642.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> This series depends on en/ort-perf-batch-11 textually, but is semantically independent of it. Changes since v1 (all for the first patch): * Add more comments explaining the sorting function, its purpose, and how its expected to be called * Small style fixup * Switch back to using string_list_sort() instead of direct QSORT() This short series has a few optimizations, but only one of which affects the testcases of interest (namely, reducing our time spent on sorting an array). It also fixes a few comments. For the testcases mentioned in commit 557ac0350d ("merge-ort: begin performance work; instrument with trace2_region_* calls", 2020-10-28), the changes in just this series improves the performance as follows: Before Series After Series no-renames: 5.622 s ± 0.059 s 5.235 s ± 0.042 s mega-renames: 10.127 s ± 0.073 s 9.419 s ± 0.107 s just-one-mega: 500.3 ms ± 3.8 ms 480.1 ms ± 3.9 ms As a reminder, before any merge-ort/diffcore-rename performance work, the performance results we started with were: no-renames-am: 6.940 s ± 0.485 s no-renames: 18.912 s ± 0.174 s mega-renames: 5964.031 s ± 10.459 s just-one-mega: 149.583 s ± 0.751 s Elijah Newren (5): merge-ort: replace string_list_df_name_compare with faster alternative diffcore-rename: avoid unnecessary strdup'ing in break_idx diffcore-rename: enable limiting rename detection to relevant destinations Fix various issues found in comments merge-ort: miscellaneous touch-ups diffcore-rename.c | 52 ++++++++++++++--- diffcore.h | 2 + merge-ort.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++-------- t/t6423-merge-rename-directories.sh | 2 +- 4 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) base-commit: 76e253793c9a1d7fdd1836d5e4db26dabd3d713a Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-962%2Fnewren%2Fort-perf-batch-12-v2 Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-962/newren/ort-perf-batch-12-v2 Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/962 Range-diff vs v1: 1: 5055dfce3281 ! 1: c4a0f6a9510c merge-ort: replace string_list_df_name_compare with faster alternative @@ Commit message "-sort" to either rebase or merge, sorting an array takes more time than anything else. Serves me right for naming my merge strategy this way. - Rewrite the comparison function and remove as many levels of indirection - as possible (e.g. the old code had - cmp_items() -> - string_list_df_name_compare() -> - df_name_compare() - now we just have sort_dirs_next_to_their_children()), and tweak it to be - as optimized as possible for our specific case. These changes reduced - the time spent in "plist special sort" by ~25% in the mega-renames case. + Rewrite the comparison function in a way that does not require finding + out the lengths of the strings when comparing them. While at it, tweak + the code for our specific case -- no need to handle a variety of modes, + for example. The combination of these changes reduced the time spent in + "plist special sort" by ~25% in the mega-renames case. For the testcases mentioned in commit 557ac0350d ("merge-ort: begin performance work; instrument with trace2_region_* calls", 2020-10-28), @@ merge-ort.c: static int detect_and_process_renames(struct merge_options *opt, /*** Function Grouping: functions related to process_entries() ***/ -static int string_list_df_name_compare(const char *one, const char *two) -+static int sort_dirs_next_to_their_children(const void *a, const void *b) ++static int sort_dirs_next_to_their_children(const char *one, const char *two) { - int onelen = strlen(one); - int twolen = strlen(two); ++ unsigned char c1, c2; ++ /* - * Here we only care that entries for D/F conflicts are - * adjacent, in particular with the file of the D/F conflict - * appearing before files below the corresponding directory. - * The order of the rest of the list is irrelevant for us. + * Here we only care that entries for directories appear adjacent -+ * to and before files underneath the directory. In other words, -+ * we do not want the natural sorting of ++ * to and before files underneath the directory. We can achieve ++ * that by pretending to add a trailing slash to every file and ++ * then sorting. In other words, we do not want the natural ++ * sorting of + * foo + * foo.txt + * foo/bar @@ merge-ort.c: static int detect_and_process_renames(struct merge_options *opt, + * To achieve this, we basically implement our own strcmp, except that + * if we get to the end of either string instead of comparing NUL to + * another character, we compare '/' to it. ++ * ++ * If this unusual "sort as though '/' were appended" perplexes ++ * you, perhaps it will help to note that this is not the final ++ * sort. write_tree() will sort again without the trailing slash ++ * magic, but just on paths immediately under a given tree. * - * To achieve this, we sort with df_name_compare and provide - * the mode S_IFDIR so that D/F conflicts will sort correctly. @@ merge-ort.c: static int detect_and_process_renames(struct merge_options *opt, - * since in other cases any changes in their order due to - * sorting cause no problems for us. + * The reason to not use df_name_compare directly was that it was -+ * just too expensive, so I had to reimplement it. ++ * just too expensive (we don't have the string lengths handy), so ++ * I had to reimplement it. */ - int cmp = df_name_compare(one, onelen, S_IFDIR, - two, twolen, S_IFDIR); -- /* ++ + /* - * Now that 'foo' and 'foo/bar' compare equal, we have to make sure - * that 'foo' comes before 'foo/bar'. -- */ ++ * NOTE: This function will never be called with two equal strings, ++ * because it is used to sort the keys of a strmap, and strmaps have ++ * unique keys by construction. That simplifies our c1==c2 handling ++ * below. + */ - if (cmp) - return cmp; - return onelen - twolen; -+ const char *one = ((struct string_list_item *)a)->string; -+ const char *two = ((struct string_list_item *)b)->string; -+ unsigned char c1, c2; + + while (*one && (*one == *two)) { + one++; @@ merge-ort.c: static int detect_and_process_renames(struct merge_options *opt, + if (c1 == c2) { + /* Getting here means one is a leading directory of the other */ + return (*one) ? 1 : -1; -+ } -+ else ++ } else + return c1-c2; } @@ merge-ort.c: static void process_entries(struct merge_options *opt, trace2_region_enter("merge", "plist special sort", opt->repo); - plist.cmp = string_list_df_name_compare; -- string_list_sort(&plist); -+ QSORT(plist.items, plist.nr, sort_dirs_next_to_their_children); ++ plist.cmp = sort_dirs_next_to_their_children; + string_list_sort(&plist); trace2_region_leave("merge", "plist special sort", opt->repo); - trace2_region_leave("merge", "process_entries setup", opt->repo); 2: 7212816c8d47 = 2: 38713ed48273 diffcore-rename: avoid unnecessary strdup'ing in break_idx 3: 19150b575058 = 3: 45e1de5fe780 diffcore-rename: enable limiting rename detection to relevant destinations 4: 98c9a419b313 = 4: 2f26d7e935c0 Fix various issues found in comments 5: e85dad887f95 = 5: 7156f26ab299 merge-ort: miscellaneous touch-ups -- gitgitgadget
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-01 14:58 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-05-27 8:37 [PATCH " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2021-05-27 8:37 ` [PATCH 1/5] merge-ort: replace string_list_df_name_compare with faster alternative Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2021-05-27 21:00 ` René Scharfe 2021-05-27 22:47 ` Elijah Newren 2021-05-28 16:12 ` René Scharfe 2021-05-28 18:09 ` Elijah Newren 2021-05-28 1:32 ` Taylor Blau 2021-05-28 4:10 ` Elijah Newren 2021-05-27 8:37 ` [PATCH 2/5] diffcore-rename: avoid unnecessary strdup'ing in break_idx Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2021-05-27 8:37 ` [PATCH 3/5] diffcore-rename: enable limiting rename detection to relevant destinations Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2021-05-27 8:37 ` [PATCH 4/5] Fix various issues found in comments Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2021-05-27 8:37 ` [PATCH 5/5] merge-ort: miscellaneous touch-ups Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2021-06-01 14:58 ` Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget [this message] 2021-06-01 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] merge-ort: replace string_list_df_name_compare with faster alternative Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2021-06-02 11:29 ` Derrick Stolee 2021-06-01 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] diffcore-rename: avoid unnecessary strdup'ing in break_idx Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2021-06-01 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] diffcore-rename: enable limiting rename detection to relevant destinations Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2021-06-03 12:54 ` Derrick Stolee 2021-06-03 14:13 ` Elijah Newren 2021-06-01 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] Fix various issues found in comments Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2021-06-01 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] merge-ort: miscellaneous touch-ups Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2021-06-03 12:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Optimization batch 12: miscellaneous unthemed stuff Derrick Stolee 2021-06-04 4:39 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2021-06-04 4:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] merge-ort: replace string_list_df_name_compare with faster alternative Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2021-06-04 4:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] diffcore-rename: avoid unnecessary strdup'ing in break_idx Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2021-06-04 4:39 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] Fix various issues found in comments Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2021-06-04 4:39 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] merge-ort: miscellaneous touch-ups Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2021-06-04 13:11 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Optimization batch 12: miscellaneous unthemed stuff Derrick Stolee 2021-06-04 15:48 ` Elijah Newren 2021-06-04 16:30 ` Elijah Newren 2021-06-04 16:35 ` Jeff King 2021-06-04 18:42 ` Derrick Stolee 2021-06-04 19:43 ` Elijah Newren 2021-06-04 19:53 ` Jeff King 2021-06-08 16:11 ` [PATCH v4 " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2021-06-08 16:11 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] merge-ort: replace string_list_df_name_compare with faster alternative Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2021-06-08 16:11 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] diffcore-rename: avoid unnecessary strdup'ing in break_idx Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2021-06-08 16:11 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] Fix various issues found in comments Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2021-06-08 16:11 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] merge-ort: miscellaneous touch-ups Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=pull.962.v2.git.1622559516.gitgitgadget@gmail.com \ --to=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \ --cc=dstolee@microsoft.com \ --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \ --cc=l.s.r@web.de \ --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \ --cc=newren@gmail.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Optimization batch 12: miscellaneous unthemed stuff' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.