From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tiwai@suse.de>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25A05AF3
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:13:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 819E9198
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:13:54 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:13:52 +0200
Message-ID: <s5h4lv0jlv3.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <87shikb6iq.fsf@intel.com>
References: <1de3c642-a4b7-1065-5c35-ba32866d471d@redhat.com>
	<s5h8tkkqfn6.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
	<alpine.LSU.2.20.1706221610000.30709@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
	<s5h7f04qewv.wl-tiwai@suse.de> <87shikb6iq.fsf@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: ksummit <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Bug reporting feedback
	loop
List-Id: <ksummit-discuss.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>

On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:12:29 +0200,
Jani Nikula wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:12:09 +0200,
> > Jiri Kosina wrote:
> >> 
> >> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >> 
> >> > - The inconsistent bug tracking over the whole kernel areas:
> >> >   which way to report purely depends on the subsystem.  Even inside a
> >> >   subsystem, some prefer bugzilla while some don't.
> >> 
> >> Agreed that this might be annoying for the reporters, but I don't think we 
> >> want to go towards pushing maintainers to use one unified solution. That'd 
> >> be counter-productive.
> >
> > I don't pursue that, either.  It'd be great, though, if we can reduce
> > the too much differences.  The variety is the strength of open source,
> > but in this case...
> 
> The least we can do is use the MAINTAINERS "B:" tag to document the
> preferences of each subsystem or driver.

Yes.  There are way too few entries for "B:" right now.


Takashi