From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB7DC2D0C6 for ; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 07:29:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5438D20838 for ; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 07:29:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="blQUSNyW" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5438D20838 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89C6C1711; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 08:28:14 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 89C6C1711 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1577431744; bh=w/Xxth3f9Wfd4ihwrBq+gCFCXrgCSabR1pHDXhH+VQI=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=blQUSNyWHTHrq5Q0Ti/evsmID0FSzADHsUR2IGjZzPBPhY40ZFXlCgNIqAePHB6dm Bkr7nRrxQhdB7CK5ZVa/6C+nHBRSoMeOAiigm6pGPjHgymmZWrKqXYnWPcuIcbfFe0 r4eGbBES1lGlC9DjiiIJ8EVjYNtpICWa+Qlg1Qeg= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1400AF80131; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 08:28:14 +0100 (CET) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 9720DF80132; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 08:28:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC27CF800AE for ; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 08:28:07 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz CC27CF800AE X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A352AC54; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 07:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 08:28:05 +0100 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Mark Brown In-Reply-To: <20191227000818.GF27497@sirena.org.uk> References: <20191204151454.21643-1-tiwai@suse.de> <20191227000818.GF27497@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/25.3 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: core: Fix access to uninitialized list heads X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 01:08:18 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 09:50:15AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > This patch seems forgotten? 5.5 still suffers from the mentioned > > bug. > > It's in my fixes branch. OK, now found a reply post of a couple of days ago. Unfortunately the commit still doesn't appear on linux-next because the update has been stopped for holidays, so I overlooked it. But... > Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time > for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so > on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) > please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been > review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. > > Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at > all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed > directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches > anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are > some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches > for the subsystem are normally handled. This warning doesn't seem fit at all. The patch was submitted three weeks ago. thanks, Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel