From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: Q: How to detect which USx2y is connected? Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:01:34 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20070205065636.GA1652@elte.hu> <45D1FE83.7000301@rncbc.org> <200702132003.44102.annabellesgarden@yahoo.de> <45D2272F.5060105@rncbc.org> <36475.194.65.103.1.1171463417.squirrel@www.rncbc.org> <3022.194.65.103.1.1171465044.squirrel@www.rncbc.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3022.194.65.103.1.1171465044.squirrel@www.rncbc.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Rui Nuno Capela Cc: Karsten Wiese , alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org At Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:57:24 -0000 (WET), Rui Nuno Capela wrote: > > > > At Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:30:17 -0000 (WET), > > Rui Nuno Capela wrote: > >> > >> Hmmm... I'm coming up with some workaround... yes, I guess the easiest > >> solution is about adding a new command line option to us428control, > >> stating which model we're into, either us428 or us224; us428 would be > >> the > >> default. > >> > >> This way, for it to work out-of-the-box, and for the US224 at least, one > >> should just change the respective udev rule, where I think the switch is > >> made based on the actual product-id on power-up. > >> > >> What you think? > > > > This is another way I thought of, too. How compatible between these > > two models? If running with a wrong option doesn't bring fatal errors > > like segfault, it'd be surely a good workaround. Of course, some > > consistency check in us428control would be nice to have. > > > > AFAICS running the wrong option would only lead to wrong functionality, > specially regarding fader-channel bank layer switching to DAW track > logical mapping. It would be a terrible mess between the logical mapping > between the US-224/428 control surface channels assignment and the actual > tracks on the DAW (e.g. Ardour), and LEDs and what not won't be consistent > of course, but for all else, no, it should not segfault ;) OK, then let's go to this way at first. We can add any possible better workarounds if found later. Takashi ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV