All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jpoimboe@redhat.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com,
	mingo@kernel.org, luto@amacapital.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bp@suse.de
Subject: [tip:x86/cleanups] x86/dumpstack: Explain the reasoning for the prologue and buffer size
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 07:22:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-4dba072cd097f35fa8f77c49d909ada2b079a4c4@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180417161124.5294-10-bp@alien8.de>

Commit-ID:  4dba072cd097f35fa8f77c49d909ada2b079a4c4
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/4dba072cd097f35fa8f77c49d909ada2b079a4c4
Author:     Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
AuthorDate: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 18:11:24 +0200
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 16:15:28 +0200

x86/dumpstack: Explain the reasoning for the prologue and buffer size

The whole reasoning behind the amount of opcode bytes dumped and prologue
length isn't very clear so write down some of the reasons for why it is
done the way it is.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180417161124.5294-10-bp@alien8.de

---
 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index ee344030fd0a..666a284116ac 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -72,6 +72,25 @@ static void printk_stack_address(unsigned long address, int reliable,
 	printk("%s %s%pB\n", log_lvl, reliable ? "" : "? ", (void *)address);
 }
 
+/*
+ * There are a couple of reasons for the 2/3rd prologue, courtesy of Linus:
+ *
+ * In case where we don't have the exact kernel image (which, if we did, we can
+ * simply disassemble and navigate to the RIP), the purpose of the bigger
+ * prologue is to have more context and to be able to correlate the code from
+ * the different toolchains better.
+ *
+ * In addition, it helps in recreating the register allocation of the failing
+ * kernel and thus make sense of the register dump.
+ *
+ * What is more, the additional complication of a variable length insn arch like
+ * x86 warrants having longer byte sequence before rIP so that the disassembler
+ * can "sync" up properly and find instruction boundaries when decoding the
+ * opcode bytes.
+ *
+ * Thus, the 2/3rds prologue and 64 byte OPCODE_BUFSIZE is just a random
+ * guesstimate in attempt to achieve all of the above.
+ */
 void show_opcodes(u8 *rip, const char *loglvl)
 {
 	unsigned int code_prologue = OPCODE_BUFSIZE * 2 / 3;

      reply	other threads:[~2018-04-26 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-17 16:11 [PATCH 0/9] x86/dumpstack: Cleanups and user opcode bytes Code: section, v3 Borislav Petkov
2018-04-17 16:11 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86/dumpstack: Remove code_bytes Borislav Petkov
2018-04-26 14:18   ` [tip:x86/cleanups] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-04-17 16:11 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86/dumpstack: Unexport oops_begin() Borislav Petkov
2018-04-26 14:19   ` [tip:x86/cleanups] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-04-17 16:11 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/dumpstack: Carve out Code: dumping into a function Borislav Petkov
2018-04-26 14:19   ` [tip:x86/cleanups] x86/dumpstack: Carve out code-dumping " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-04-17 16:11 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/dumpstack: Improve opcodes dumping in the Code: section Borislav Petkov
2018-04-26 14:20   ` [tip:x86/cleanups] x86/dumpstack: Improve opcodes dumping in the code section tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-04-17 16:11 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/dumpstack: Add loglevel argument to show_opcodes() Borislav Petkov
2018-04-26 14:20   ` [tip:x86/cleanups] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-04-17 16:11 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/fault: Dump user opcode bytes on fatal faults Borislav Petkov
2018-04-26 14:21   ` [tip:x86/cleanups] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-04-17 16:11 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/dumpstack: Add a show_ip() function Borislav Petkov
2018-04-26 14:21   ` [tip:x86/cleanups] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-04-17 16:11 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/dumpstack: Save first regs set for the executive summary Borislav Petkov
2018-04-26 14:22   ` [tip:x86/cleanups] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-04-17 16:11 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/dumpstack: Explain the reasoning for the prologue and buffer size Borislav Petkov
2018-04-26 14:22   ` tip-bot for Borislav Petkov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-4dba072cd097f35fa8f77c49d909ada2b079a4c4@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.