[tip:locking/core] drivers/tty: Compute 'current' directly

[tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso <tipbot@zytor.com>]

Commit-ID:  5376f2e722026e91cb46384bda8d8b3e9f88217c
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/5376f2e722026e91cb46384bda8d8b3e9f88217c
Author:     Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
AuthorDate: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 13:43:12 -0800
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:14:13 +0100

drivers/tty: Compute 'current' directly

This patch effectively replaces the tsk pointer dereference
(which is obviously == current), to directly use get_current()
macro. This is to make the removal of setting foreign task
states smoother and painfully obvious. Performance win on some
archs such as x86-64 and ppc64 -- arm64 is no longer an issue.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1483479794-14013-3-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c | 18 ++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c
index 1bf8ed1..3e67229 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c
@@ -200,7 +200,6 @@ static struct ld_semaphore __sched *
 down_read_failed(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long count, long timeout)
 {
 	struct ldsem_waiter waiter;
-	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
 	long adjust = -LDSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS + LDSEM_WAIT_BIAS;
 
 	/* set up my own style of waitqueue */
@@ -221,8 +220,8 @@ down_read_failed(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long count, long timeout)
 	list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->read_wait);
 	sem->wait_readers++;
 
-	waiter.task = tsk;
-	get_task_struct(tsk);
+	waiter.task = current;
+	get_task_struct(current);
 
 	/* if there are no active locks, wake the new lock owner(s) */
 	if ((count & LDSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) == 0)
@@ -232,7 +231,7 @@ down_read_failed(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long count, long timeout)
 
 	/* wait to be given the lock */
 	for (;;) {
-		set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+		set_task_state(current, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 
 		if (!waiter.task)
 			break;
@@ -241,7 +240,7 @@ down_read_failed(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long count, long timeout)
 		timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
 	}
 
-	__set_task_state(tsk, TASK_RUNNING);
+	__set_task_state(current, TASK_RUNNING);
 
 	if (!timeout) {
 		/* lock timed out but check if this task was just
@@ -268,7 +267,6 @@ static struct ld_semaphore __sched *
 down_write_failed(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long count, long timeout)
 {
 	struct ldsem_waiter waiter;
-	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
 	long adjust = -LDSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS;
 	int locked = 0;
 
@@ -289,16 +287,16 @@ down_write_failed(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long count, long timeout)
 
 	list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->write_wait);
 
-	waiter.task = tsk;
+	waiter.task = current;
 
-	set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+	set_task_state(current, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 	for (;;) {
 		if (!timeout)
 			break;
 		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
 		timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
 		raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
-		set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+		set_task_state(current, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 		locked = writer_trylock(sem);
 		if (locked)
 			break;
@@ -309,7 +307,7 @@ down_write_failed(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long count, long timeout)
 	list_del(&waiter.list);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
 
-	__set_task_state(tsk, TASK_RUNNING);
+	__set_task_state(current, TASK_RUNNING);
 
 	/* lock wait may have timed out */
 	if (!locked)