From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8DFC43381 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 02:13:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA88421738 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 02:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726286AbfBTCNU (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:13:20 -0500 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]:33588 "EHLO mx1.math.uh.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725616AbfBTCNU (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:13:20 -0500 Received: from epithumia.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.2]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gwHNq-0001Vc-EW; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 20:13:15 -0600 Received: by epithumia.math.uh.edu (Postfix, from userid 7225) id 64EE2801B44; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 20:13:14 -0600 (CST) From: Jason L Tibbitts III To: Trond Myklebust Cc: "bcodding\@redhat.com" , "Anna.Schumaker\@netapp.com" , "linux-nfs\@vger.kernel.org" , "Chuck.Lever\@oracle.com" Subject: Re: Need help debugging NFS issues new to 4.20 kernel References: <87ftt2cdeq.fsf@hippogriff.math.uh.edu> <87imxwab12.fsf@hippogriff.math.uh.edu> <662CE7B3-235E-4E2D-9C8C-0F6233F3085F@redhat.com> <87d0o3aadg.fsf@hippogriff.math.uh.edu> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 20:13:14 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Trond Myklebust's message of "Sat, 16 Feb 2019 14:46:45 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "TM" == Trond Myklebust writes: TM> Hmm... Does the following patch help at all? I un-wrapped it and applied it over 4.20.10 and pushed it out to a couple of problematic machines. So far it's been OK there, so I've rolled it out to 50 desktops (because they happen to have secure boot disabled and thus allow me to boot custom kernels) and I guess we'll see how that goes. - J<