From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]:33580 "EHLO mx2.math.uh.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750763AbcCABDd (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Feb 2016 20:03:33 -0500 From: Jason L Tibbitts III To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NFS: nfs4_reclaim_open_state: Lock reclaim failed! log spew References: <20160225195827.GC23315@fieldses.org> <20160301004844.GA11952@fieldses.org> <20160301010120.GB11952@fieldses.org> Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:03:31 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20160301010120.GB11952@fieldses.org> (J. Bruce Fields's message of "Mon, 29 Feb 2016 20:01:20 -0500") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: >>>>> "JBF" == J Bruce Fields writes: JBF> I believe the order of flavors in the sec= option is the order JBF> they're given to the client, so reversing it might cause new JBF> clients to make a different choice--but I'm not actually sure of JBF> the logic there. I've found it not to actually be stable; different Linux versions will do different things. But then, almost all of the desktops are now running a single OS release so unless it's simply random, that should be good enough. I'll add krb5 to the exports and try to catch this again. - J<