From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthieu Moy Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] More consistant terminology ("remote-tracking branch", "not updated") Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:30:08 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1287851481-27952-1-git-send-email-Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> <20101023191104.GM21040@burratino> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jakub Narebski , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jonathan Nieder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 25 19:33:42 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PAQvV-0002Vv-9j for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:33:41 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759225Ab0JYRda (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:33:30 -0400 Received: from imag.imag.fr ([129.88.30.1]:51989 "EHLO imag.imag.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759216Ab0JYRda (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:33:30 -0400 Received: from mail-veri.imag.fr (mail-veri.imag.fr [129.88.43.52]) by imag.imag.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PHU8xC022893 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:30:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bauges.imag.fr ([129.88.43.5]) by mail-veri.imag.fr with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PAQs4-0007xu-9s; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:30:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20101023191104.GM21040@burratino> (Jonathan Nieder's message of "Sat\, 23 Oct 2010 14\:11\:04 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (imag.imag.fr [129.88.30.1]); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:30:09 +0200 (CEST) X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact MI2S MIM for more information X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-IMAG-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-IMAG-MailScanner-From: matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jonathan Nieder writes: > Jakub Narebski wrote: >> Matthieu Moy writes: > >>> this is an attempt to be more consistant in the terminology used in Git. >> >> Thank you very much for your work! > > Yes, seconded! Actually, I did the easy part ;-) (easy grep-able patterns, and uncontroversal solution). There's still a mess about the "upstream/downstream" Vs "remote-tracking" terminology, both in the UI (--track options here and there) and the doc. And I'd really like the "index/cache/stage" thing to be fixed too. I like "stage/staging area" best, but it seems this part does not make a consensus (yet?). I'm just hoping I gave the right example and someone else will now take care of these two ;-). -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/