From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49035) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBKOo-0007zD-9a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 08:19:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBKOl-0007YH-5L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 08:19:22 -0400 From: Alberto Garcia In-Reply-To: References: <20170511144208.24075-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20170511144208.24075-10-pbonzini@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 14:19:17 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH 09/18] throttle-groups: protect throttled requests with a CoMutex List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: famz@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com On Thu 18 May 2017 02:08:32 PM CEST, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Does io_limits_disabled need locking too? > > It uses atomic access since patch 3. Ah, I overlooked that one, sorry! Berto