From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Moyer Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] nvdimm: Add IOCTL pass thru Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:54:28 -0500 Message-ID: References: <2792786733bc18d561ca352d7a642b3989a370fa.1446684001.git.jerry.hoemann@hpe.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51428 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751031AbbKJVya (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:54:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <2792786733bc18d561ca352d7a642b3989a370fa.1446684001.git.jerry.hoemann@hpe.com> (Jerry Hoemann's message of "Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:27:30 -0700") Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Jerry Hoemann Cc: ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org Jerry Hoemann writes: > + uuid = pkg->h.dsm_uuid; > + rev = pkg->h.dsm_rev ? pkg->h.dsm_rev : 1; Shouldn't revision id be required? Cheers, Jeff