From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946056AbbDXUdS (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:33:18 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53886 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757256AbbDXUdQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:33:16 -0400 From: Jeff Moyer To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jens Axboe , Tejun Heo , Ming Lin , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: remove unused BIO_RW_BLOCK and BIO_EOF flags References: <1429904462-16998-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1429904462-16998-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20150424195316.GA20013@lst.de> X-PGP-KeyID: 1F78E1B4 X-PGP-CertKey: F6FE 280D 8293 F72C 65FD 5A58 1FF8 A7CA 1F78 E1B4 X-PCLoadLetter: What the f**k does that mean? Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:33:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150424195316.GA20013@lst.de> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Fri, 24 Apr 2015 21:53:16 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig writes: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 03:47:37PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: >> Any particular reason you elected to leave a hole in the numbering? I >> don't have a preference either way, but I don't think there's any harm >> in compressing it. > > This was the simplest way to do it and I'm a lazy bastard. Heh. /me looks at hch's contributions... You have a rather broad definition of lazy. :-)