From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jmoyer@redhat.com (Jeff Moyer)
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:54:19 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 02/47] block: fix blk_abort_request for blk-mq drivers
In-Reply-To: <564F94F2.1030603@fb.com> (Jens Axboe's message of "Fri, 20 Nov
 2015 14:47:30 -0700")
References: <1448037342-18384-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>
 <1448037342-18384-3-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>
 <x491tbkcpp2.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
 <564F94F2.1030603@fb.com>
Message-ID: <x49wptcbalw.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>

Jens Axboe <axboe at fb.com> writes:

> On 11/20/2015 02:43 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> writes:
>>
>>> We only added the request to the request list for the !blk-mq case,
>>> so we should only delete it in that case as well.
>>
>> Sorry, I don't follow.  Do you mean the timeout_list?  It appears to me
>> that blk_add_timer is called for both the old and mq paths.
>
> It is called for both, but only !mq adds it to the list. We don't need
> that tracking on the mq side, as we can look it up in our tags.

Yeah, just saw that.  Thanks.

-Jeff