All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:14:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49y4f4go57.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444793448-9994-2-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> (Ming Lei's message of "Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:30:45 +0800")

Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> writes:

> The number of bio->bi_phys_segments is always obtained
> during bio splitting, so it is natural to setup it
> just after bio splitting, then we can avoid to compute
> nr_segment again during merge.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>

Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>

> ---
>  block/blk-merge.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> index c4e9c37..22293fd 100644
> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> @@ -11,13 +11,16 @@
>  
>  static struct bio *blk_bio_discard_split(struct request_queue *q,
>  					 struct bio *bio,
> -					 struct bio_set *bs)
> +					 struct bio_set *bs,
> +					 unsigned *nsegs)
>  {
>  	unsigned int max_discard_sectors, granularity;
>  	int alignment;
>  	sector_t tmp;
>  	unsigned split_sectors;
>  
> +	*nsegs = 1;
> +
>  	/* Zero-sector (unknown) and one-sector granularities are the same.  */
>  	granularity = max(q->limits.discard_granularity >> 9, 1U);
>  
> @@ -51,8 +54,11 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_discard_split(struct request_queue *q,
>  
>  static struct bio *blk_bio_write_same_split(struct request_queue *q,
>  					    struct bio *bio,
> -					    struct bio_set *bs)
> +					    struct bio_set *bs,
> +					    unsigned *nsegs)
>  {
> +	*nsegs = 1;
> +
>  	if (!q->limits.max_write_same_sectors)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> @@ -64,7 +70,8 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_write_same_split(struct request_queue *q,
>  
>  static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q,
>  					 struct bio *bio,
> -					 struct bio_set *bs)
> +					 struct bio_set *bs,
> +					 unsigned *segs)
>  {
>  	struct bio_vec bv, bvprv, *bvprvp = NULL;
>  	struct bvec_iter iter;
> @@ -106,22 +113,30 @@ new_segment:
>  		sectors += bv.bv_len >> 9;
>  	}
>  
> +	*segs = nsegs;
>  	return NULL;
>  split:
> +	*segs = nsegs;
>  	return bio_split(bio, sectors, GFP_NOIO, bs);
>  }
>  
>  void blk_queue_split(struct request_queue *q, struct bio **bio,
>  		     struct bio_set *bs)
>  {
> -	struct bio *split;
> +	struct bio *split, *res;
> +	unsigned nsegs;
>  
>  	if ((*bio)->bi_rw & REQ_DISCARD)
> -		split = blk_bio_discard_split(q, *bio, bs);
> +		split = blk_bio_discard_split(q, *bio, bs, &nsegs);
>  	else if ((*bio)->bi_rw & REQ_WRITE_SAME)
> -		split = blk_bio_write_same_split(q, *bio, bs);
> +		split = blk_bio_write_same_split(q, *bio, bs, &nsegs);
>  	else
> -		split = blk_bio_segment_split(q, *bio, q->bio_split);
> +		split = blk_bio_segment_split(q, *bio, q->bio_split, &nsegs);
> +
> +	/* physical segments can be figured out during splitting */
> +	res = split ? split : *bio;
> +	res->bi_phys_segments = nsegs;
> +	bio_set_flag(res, BIO_SEG_VALID);
>  
>  	if (split) {
>  		bio_chain(split, *bio);

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-15 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-14  3:30 [PATCH 0/4] block: some misc changes Ming Lei
2015-10-14  3:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting Ming Lei
2015-10-15 15:14   ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2015-10-14  3:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] block: avoid to merge splitted bio Ming Lei
2015-10-15 15:15   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-14  3:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] blk-mq: check bio_mergeable() early before merging Ming Lei
2015-10-15 15:21   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-16  0:26     ` Ming Lei
2015-10-14  3:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] blk-mq: mark ctx as pending at batch in flush plug path Ming Lei
2015-10-15 15:26   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-16  0:24     ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=x49y4f4go57.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
    --to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.l@ssi.samsung.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.