Re: [PATCH v3] remote-curl: send Accept-Language header to server

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

"Li Linchao via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

> @@ -932,6 +933,10 @@ static int post_rpc(struct rpc_state *rpc, int stateless_connect, int flush_rece
>  	headers = curl_slist_append(headers, needs_100_continue ?
>  		"Expect: 100-continue" : "Expect:");
>  
> +	/* Add Accept-Language header */
> +	if (rpc->hdr_accept_language)
> +		headers = curl_slist_append(headers, rpc->hdr_accept_language);
> +
>  	/* Add the extra Git-Protocol header */
>  	if (rpc->protocol_header)
>  		headers = curl_slist_append(headers, rpc->protocol_header);
> @@ -1080,6 +1085,8 @@ static int rpc_service(struct rpc_state *rpc, struct discovery *heads,
>  	strbuf_addf(&buf, "%s%s", url.buf, svc);
>  	rpc->service_url = strbuf_detach(&buf, NULL);
>  
> +	rpc->hdr_accept_language = xstrdup_or_null(http_get_accept_language_header());
> +
>  	strbuf_addf(&buf, "Content-Type: application/x-%s-request", svc);
>  	rpc->hdr_content_type = strbuf_detach(&buf, NULL);
>  
> @@ -1118,6 +1125,7 @@ static int rpc_service(struct rpc_state *rpc, struct discovery *heads,
>  	free(rpc->service_url);
>  	free(rpc->hdr_content_type);
>  	free(rpc->hdr_accept);
> +	free(rpc->hdr_accept_language);
>  	free(rpc->protocol_header);
>  	free(rpc->buf);
>  	strbuf_release(&buf);
> @@ -1400,6 +1408,7 @@ static int stateless_connect(const char *service_name)
>  	struct discovery *discover;
>  	struct rpc_state rpc;
>  	struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> +	const char *accept_language;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Run the info/refs request and see if the server supports protocol
> @@ -1418,6 +1427,9 @@ static int stateless_connect(const char *service_name)
>  		printf("\n");
>  		fflush(stdout);
>  	}
> +	accept_language = http_get_accept_language_header();
> +	if (accept_language)
> +		rpc.hdr_accept_language = xstrfmt("%s", accept_language);

Isn't rpc.hdr_accept_language left uninitialized garbage if
accept_language is NULL?  It is the same bug I pointed out earlier,
whose fix may have to be different.

Has this been tested?  I got immediate segfault with this patch in
'seen'.