All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>,
	Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
	Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>,
	Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] rebase --apply: remove duplicated code
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 11:25:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq35i7r4rj.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4320f2fcf35f180e1c585be4105194f1555a874.1650448612.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget's message of "Wed, 20 Apr 2022 09:56:44 +0000")

"Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

> -	strbuf_reset(&msg);

This is unnecessary, because we have released immediately before.

> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
>
> When we are reattaching HEAD after a fast-forward we can use
> move_to_original_branch() rather than open coding a copy of that
> code. The old code appears to handle the case where the rebase is
> started from a detached HEAD but in fact in that case there is nothing
> to do as we have already updated HEAD.

At the beginning of move_to_original_branch(), there is an early
return to do nothing when the head is detached.  But the code before
the pre-context of the hunk already detached the head at the "onto",
and the fast-forward case wants to leave the detached head pointing
at that "onto" commit, so the early return without doing anything is
exactly what we want to see.

Does that mean that the original code had left two reflog entries
for HEAD, one to detach at the "onto" commit, and then in this block
to say "rebase finished" here?  With the new code, because we return
early from move_to_original_branch(), we no longer leave the "rebase
finished" record in the reflog of HEAD?

Is it done deliberately as an improvement, or an oversight that led
to a possible regression?

Or do we still add the reflog entry for HEAD that says "rebase finished"
somewhere else when we trigger the early return and I am misreading
the code?

> >  	if (oideq(&merge_base, &options.orig_head)) {
>  		printf(_("Fast-forwarded %s to %s.\n"),
>  			branch_name, options.onto_name);
> -		strbuf_addf(&msg, "rebase finished: %s onto %s",
> -			options.head_name ? options.head_name : "detached HEAD",
> -			oid_to_hex(&options.onto->object.oid));
> -		memset(&ropts, 0, sizeof(ropts));
> -		ropts.branch = options.head_name;
> -		ropts.flags = RESET_HEAD_REFS_ONLY;
> -		ropts.head_msg = msg.buf;
> -		reset_head(the_repository, &ropts);
> -		strbuf_release(&msg);
> +		move_to_original_branch(&options);
>  		ret = finish_rebase(&options);
>  		goto cleanup;
>  	}


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-20 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-21 11:10 [PATCH 0/7] rebase: make reflog messages independent of the backend Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-02-21 11:10 ` [PATCH 1/7] rebase --apply: remove duplicated code Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-07 13:35   ` Christian Couder
2022-04-17  1:56     ` Elijah Newren
2022-02-21 11:10 ` [PATCH 2/7] rebase --merge: fix reflog when continuing Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-07 13:49   ` Christian Couder
2022-04-15 14:00     ` Phillip Wood
2022-04-17  1:57       ` Elijah Newren
2022-02-21 11:10 ` [PATCH 3/7] rebase --merge: fix reflog message after skipping Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-17  1:58   ` Elijah Newren
2022-02-21 11:10 ` [PATCH 4/7] rebase --apply: respect GIT_REFLOG_ACTION Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-07 13:59   ` Christian Couder
2022-04-15 14:03     ` Phillip Wood
2022-02-21 11:10 ` [PATCH 5/7] rebase --apply: make reflog messages match rebase --merge Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-17  2:03   ` Elijah Newren
2022-02-21 11:10 ` [PATCH 6/7] rebase --abort: improve reflog message Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-17  2:07   ` Elijah Newren
2022-02-21 11:10 ` [PATCH 7/7] rebase: cleanup action handling Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-17  2:07   ` Elijah Newren
2022-04-04 15:34 ` Review Request (was Re: [PATCH 0/7] rebase: make reflog messages independent of the backend) Phillip Wood
2022-04-17  2:13   ` Elijah Newren
2022-04-18 18:56     ` Phillip Wood
2022-04-07 14:15 ` [PATCH 0/7] rebase: make reflog messages independent of the backend Christian Couder
2022-04-17  2:09 ` Elijah Newren
2022-04-20  9:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] " Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-20  9:56   ` [PATCH v2 1/8] rebase --apply: remove duplicated code Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-20 10:10     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-04-20 18:25     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-04-20 18:39       ` Junio C Hamano
2022-04-20  9:56   ` [PATCH v2 2/8] t3406: rework rebase reflog tests Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-20 20:17     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-04-20  9:56   ` [PATCH v2 3/8] rebase --merge: fix reflog when continuing Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-20  9:56   ` [PATCH v2 4/8] rebase --merge: fix reflog message after skipping Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-20  9:56   ` [PATCH v2 5/8] rebase --apply: respect GIT_REFLOG_ACTION Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-20  9:56   ` [PATCH v2 6/8] rebase --apply: make reflog messages match rebase --merge Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-20 10:22     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-04-20 22:15     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-04-20  9:56   ` [PATCH v2 7/8] rebase --abort: improve reflog message Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-20  9:56   ` [PATCH v2 8/8] rebase: cleanup action handling Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-20 10:34     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-10-12  9:35   ` [PATCH v3 0/8] rebase: make reflog messages independent of the backend Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-12  9:35     ` [PATCH v3 1/8] rebase --apply: remove duplicated code Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-12 20:36       ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-13 18:13         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-20  9:50           ` Phillip Wood
2022-10-12  9:35     ` [PATCH v3 2/8] t3406: rework rebase reflog tests Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-12  9:35     ` [PATCH v3 3/8] rebase --merge: fix reflog when continuing Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-12  9:35     ` [PATCH v3 4/8] rebase --merge: fix reflog message after skipping Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-12  9:35     ` [PATCH v3 5/8] rebase --apply: respect GIT_REFLOG_ACTION Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-12  9:35     ` [PATCH v3 6/8] rebase --apply: make reflog messages match rebase --merge Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-12  9:35     ` [PATCH v3 7/8] rebase --abort: improve reflog message Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-12  9:35     ` [PATCH v3 8/8] rebase: cleanup action handling Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-12 20:37     ` [PATCH v3 0/8] rebase: make reflog messages independent of the backend Junio C Hamano
2022-10-13  8:44       ` Phillip Wood
2022-10-13 15:31         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-21  9:21     ` [PATCH v4 " Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-21  9:21       ` [PATCH v4 1/8] t3406: rework rebase reflog tests Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-21  9:21       ` [PATCH v4 2/8] rebase --apply: improve fast-forward reflog message Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-21  9:21       ` [PATCH v4 3/8] rebase --merge: fix reflog when continuing Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-21 17:37         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-25 10:08           ` Phillip Wood
2022-10-25 16:11             ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-26 15:17               ` Phillip Wood
2022-10-26 16:55                 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-21  9:21       ` [PATCH v4 4/8] rebase --merge: fix reflog message after skipping Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-21  9:21       ` [PATCH v4 5/8] rebase --apply: respect GIT_REFLOG_ACTION Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-21 17:38         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-21  9:21       ` [PATCH v4 6/8] rebase --apply: make reflog messages match rebase --merge Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-21 17:39         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-21  9:21       ` [PATCH v4 7/8] rebase --abort: improve reflog message Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-21 17:44         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-21  9:21       ` [PATCH v4 8/8] rebase: cleanup action handling Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-21 17:54         ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq35i7r4rj.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.