From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4425DC4707F for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 08:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F87561444 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 08:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232086AbhEYIJh (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2021 04:09:37 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:62993 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232009AbhEYIJH (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2021 04:09:07 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE3D136768; Tue, 25 May 2021 04:06:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=9Z/6iqQY7Sxv joD5TwOUahyzZ+rkeYu28gtl9tgmbYs=; b=g7YWafQofVjipMYbFTbyR42yobvA RbNlw/Ffg/dZD1rbjHPsQREHsQdoUvaOl2OesKiW4HlLMr+IlKJojcsKzRTARGJj fng8h0W93RekpSUg3+tDgQ+Q66ryFjmlwZbjd0jJ9nHxjVfKe3POB7u6DqnTCTaK t2HlnMYN1jU9law= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07289136767; Tue, 25 May 2021 04:06:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.73.10.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D70A136766; Tue, 25 May 2021 04:06:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: Taylor Blau , Derrick Stolee , Jonathan Nieder , Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Derrick Stolee , Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: [PATCH] t1092: use GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY for consistent results References: <87fsybohy5.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <87y2c3mezw.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 17:06:33 +0900 In-Reply-To: <87y2c3mezw.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsOGdmFyIEFy?= =?utf-8?B?bmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Tue, 25 May 2021 09:39:02 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1FB0D41C-BD30-11EB-B5CD-FA9E2DDBB1FC-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: > Well yes, it works in the sense that instead of arbitrary big value for > delay we have the biggerest and largerest value we can manage :) > > I mean why do just that when we can also do this: Don't make unnecessary changes before any release. If a breakage can be fixed without risking to introduce any new breakages with code change, postpone such a change and save bandwidth to finding and fixing _other_ regressions. Thanks.